Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report

of 115

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Community Lifestyle Services

Weighted Performance Index (in order of Importance)

 Theme 2                        2017 Survey
 Community                      Importance Performance Performance
 Lifestyle Services             Means       Means      Indexes
 Community Safety                   4.37      3.81        76.1%
 Environment                        4.35      3.75        74.9%
 Protection &
 Conservation
 Environmental                      4.33      3.71        74.3%
 Controls
 Community Services                 4.29      3.68        73.6%
 Parks, Playgrounds &               4.23      3.92        78.3%
 Public Amenities
 Libraries & other                  4.20      4.15        83.0%
 Information Access
 Pet/Animal Control                 4.07      3.62        72.3%
 Sporting &                         3.98      3.94        78.8%
 Recreational Facilities
 Heritage Protection                3.93      3.64        72.7%
 Community                          3.92      3.59        71.8%
 Development
 Cultural &                         3.82      3.64        72.7%
 Entertainment
 Facilities
 Shopping Facilities                3.79      3.63        76.1%
 Means                              4.11      3.76
 Total Performance                                        75.2%
 Index


The weighted Total Performance Index (TPI) for Community Lifestyle Services in 2017
is 75.2% of the Optimum.

Weighted Performance Indicator scores vary from survey to survey, as they are
affected by changes to Importance scores as well as Performance scores. Therefore,
they can be used as a way of ensuring that planning targets for both Importance and
Performance are kept within realistic achievable ranges.

They also clearly show where the community’s resources should be allocated to
achieve planning objectives




Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD                   24
Log in to download the original file

2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report(PDF, 2MB).pdf · 1.9 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.