Original source · versioned page text
2021-10-08 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 8 OCTOBER 2021
been identified as a critical priority for Council and the community in helping to build coastal
resilience and manage erosion risks.
More monitoring – more emphasis has been added in relation to the need to monitor changes
over time. This includes enhancing our program of monitoring and data collection to inform
future adaptation responses in partnership with the State Government, research agencies,
CSIRO, the University of Sunshine Coast and the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) where
possible.
Clarity on Planning Scheme – One of the misconceptions with the draft CHAP is that it impacts
on private use rights. It does not. Only changes to the Council planning scheme could do this.
The draft CHAP does however make clearer that the Council will take a ‘stepped’ monitor-
manage-review approach to help inform appropriate land use planning responses. It
recognises that the Council will need to amend the Noosa Plan 2020 to ensure it aligns with
State Planning Policy requirements regarding coastal erosion risks. This latter issue is a
requirement mandated by the State.
Community comment Proposed response
General – CHAP approach
Many current Noosa residents did not live here The CHAP takes a measured approach to
throughout the 70's when a couple of cyclones managing risks progressively over time as coastal
affected Noosa. Building in vulnerable areas needs hazards increase and new information is available.
to consider extreme weather events and climate It acknowledges the need for early planning and a
change and take account of information being clear monitor-and-manage approach to ensure that
provided by scientists regarding rising sea level suitable management responses are taking at the
rise. appropriate points.
Over the last 40-50 years of coming to Noosa, there The CHAP seeks to ensure that Council and the
has been erosion of Noosa’s beaches and flooding community are well informed of potential risks of
in Noosaville from time to time. You just need to coastal erosion, tidal inundation and sea level rise,
look at the old photos at the Surf Club to know how as well as the necessary steps to manage these
the beach eroded in the past. These rare events will risks.
continue to occur, and the Noosa Council must This will guide council decisions around
learn as much as possible from history to try and infrastructure planning and design, environmental
mitigate their effects. The models into the future are management, and development requirements, as
less relevant than what historical data tells us and well as help the community with making informed
the model’s validity should be treated with caution. building and investment decisions.
Rate payers in the future should not be burdened
with clean-up costs associated with neglect of the
warnings in place now. The following proposed changes to the CHAP
have been made:
CHAP needs to take a moderate and “stepped
approach” in determining what assumptions and - The CHAP has been made clearer to show the
responses are adopted at different time periods interrelationships between the various adaptation
rather than focusing on worst case scenarios. responses and their staged implementation over
time. This helps take account of uncertainties,
The CHAP needs to take an iterative adaption highlights key steps and provides for the
approach that evolves over time and takes consideration of any new information.
advantage of increased information and
technological advancements – as reflected in the - Pathway diagrams for each locality have been
intent of the Q2100 program, which makes it clear added to show the various adaptation responses,
that not everything has to be done in one hit. linkages and their sequence of delivery.
CHAP spends too much time talking about the
development of the plan, and does not provide Refer to Sections 5 of CHAP for changes and new
enough specific detail on adaptation plans and diagrams.
actions proposed.
As someone who knowingly bought a property
within the hazard area, I don’t expect Council to be
taking responsibility for my potential loss, by
spending too much money on mitigation works.
Page 5 of 26
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.