Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

51989.1635.01 Change to Existing Approval

of 36

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

 Minutos of Extraordinary General Meeting held 24'" January 2012                              MYKONOS NOOSA CTS 4610


Motion 2       RENOVATIONS TO LOT 1 - Ordinary Resolution                                     MOTION LOST


               (Motion proposed by Mrs AK Wright MBE - Lot 1)                                 Votes in favour:           0
                                                                                              Votes against:             3
               That the Body Corporate authorise and approve, pursuant to the Body            Abstentions:               0
               Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation
               2008 Section 164, the improvements to Mykonos house, Unit 1, 37 Duke
               Street Sunshine Beach in accordance with plans prepared by Carole
               Tretheway, architect and numbered WD 201 to 208 and WD 501 to 509
               (copies enclosed).

               (Meeting Note: The meeting date and location had been changed to
               allow all Owners the opportunity to attend and discuss this proposal.
               Mrs C Tretheway, the architect who has designed the renovations was
               also in attendance to clarify any design concerns that may have
               arisen.

               The discussions were far reaching and after an inspection of the roof
               terrace of Lot 3 which would be most affected by the proposed
               renovations to Lot 1, the following course of action was agreed:

               The motion would be amended to include the following conditions:

                     1.   External lighting would have an arc of 180 degrees and be
                          faced inward.
                     2.   Additional mature plantings would be planted between Lot I
                          and Lots 2 and 3.
                    3.    No spotlights would be allowed on the roof of Lot I facing
                          towards Lots 2 and 3.
                    4.    The Owner of Lot 1 would arrange and pay for external
                          washing of Lots 2 and 3 once the renovations to Lot 1 have
                          been completed.
                    5.    The Owners of Lots 2 and 3 would be given a minimum of I
                          months' notice of the commencement of the proposed
                          renovations which is to include an estimated completion
                          date.
                    6.    Strict instructions to be issued to all workmen by the Owner
                          of Lot 1 that no parking is to be allowed in the driveway of
                          Lots 2 and 3.
                     7.   The Owner of Lot I is to support any request from the Owners
                          of Lots 2 and 3 to raise the level of the rear wall on their roof
                          decks which may be required as a result of the proposed
                          renovations to Lot 1.
                    8.    The Owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3 have agreed to the installation
                          of individual water meters by Bones Murray Plumbing at a
                          cost of $5,760.70 inclusive of GST to be paid from the Sinking
                          Fund and further that a special sinking fund levy of $40.00 per
                          lot entitlement totalling $4,000.00 be raised in accordance
                          with Section 151(16) of the Body Corporate and Community
                          Management (Standard Module) regulation 2008 as amended
                          to meet part of the cost of this work. (The quotation from
                          Bones Murray Plumbing was the cheaper of the two
                          quotations obtained.

               Accordingly the original motion was put to the vote and defeated. An
               amended motion was then put to the vote and carried as detailed
               below.)




                                                           P. T.0

 l .4610MykonosNoosalMinuteslEGM M,nutesIEGM2401124oc                                                      Page 2 of 3

Used in these records

About this file

File size
7.6 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

51989.1635.01 Change to Existing Approval.pdf · 7.6 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.