Council archive · source document
Planning Report · OPW22/0093
9. Assessment against assessment benchmarks
ASSESSMENT BENCHMARKS RELATED TO THE PLANNING REGULATION 2017
State Planning Policy
• Nil applicable.
South-East Queensland Regional Plan
• Nil applicable.
Schedule 10
• Nil applicable.
ASSESSMENT BENCHMARKS RELATED TO THE PLANNING SCHEME
Only aspects where the development did not comply with an acceptable outcome has been discussed
below, with compliance being demonstrated with the relating performance outcome.
Low Density Housing Code AO9.1 (Front Setback)
AO9.2 (Rear Setback)
Setback
PO9
Buildings and structures are designed and sited to:
1. provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site and adjoining premises,
including provision of visual and acoustic privacy and access to sunlight;
2. not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or habitable
areas of adjoining premises;
3. provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
4. preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
5. allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including adequate area
at ground level for landscaping with trees, shrubs and outdoor living;
6. be consistent with the predominant character of the streetscape; and
7. protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important
areas such as national parks, waterways and wetlands.
Comment:
The proposed carport and rear alfresco extension have been designed to reflect the overall existing design
of the dwelling house. They are of high level and will look like part of the original house. With regards to
the rear alfresco, a 1m setback to the roof structure is maintained creating a reasonable setback to the
adjoining property. The 1 metre setback allows for shrubs and other landscaping to be provided between
the boundary and roof alfresco.
Both adjoining rear properties pools and recreation areas back on to the proposed alfresco area.
Accordingly, both adjoining rear property owners have provided landowner consent for the proposed
relaxation. The common boundary with the two rear properties is landscaped with palm like species and
creates a good ongoing visual and noise screening outcome.
Overall development complies with PO9 in this circumstance.
CL6006/1-01/07/2018 5 of 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Planning Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 694 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.