Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

16-001014-01A (Swmp)

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW16/0203 - 3 of 4.

of 80

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (13.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                           Table 3-8:    Central Basin Stage Storage Discharge Relationship
                          Accumulated
      Stage (m AHD)                          Discharge (m3/s)     Basin Control/ Structure
                          Storage (m3)
     99.6                      0                   0.00           Primary Front & Side Orifices
     99.7                     237                  0.06
     99.8                     485                  0.17
     99.9                     744                  0.33
     100.0                   1,013                 0.53
     100.1                   1,293                 0.77
     100.2                   1,583                 0.87
     100.3                   1,884                 0.96
     100.4                   2,196                 1.04           Primary Outlet Pit Weir Level (RL100.45mAHD)
     100.5                   2,517                 1.21
     100.6                   2,885                 1.66
     100.7                   3,265                 2.01
     100.8                   3,658                 2.06
     100.9                   4,069                 2.12           Major Overflow Weir (Major & Extreme Events)
     101.0                   4,489                 2.98
     101.1                   4,919                 4.60
     101.2                   5,359                 6.77
     101.3                   5,808                 9.43           Minimum Top of Embankment (RL 101.3m AHD)

3.2.6     DEVELOPED MITIGATED PEAKS FLOW RESULTS

Modelling was undertaken for the all recurrence interval storm events up to and including the 1% AEP storm event with
storm durations ranging from 30 to 120 minutes (these were considered the critical durations). A comparison between
peak flows for the existing and developed mitigated scenarios has been provided at each discharge location in Table 3-9
below.

                           Table 3-9:   Developed Mitigated Scenario Peak Flow Comparison
                                         Existing Peak       Developed Peak         Percentage
                        AEP             Discharge (m3/s)     Discharge (m3/s)       Difference
                                                      Discharge Location A (North)
                        63%                   0.17                0.16                  -5%
                        39%                   0.26                0.23                  -8%
                        18%                   0.36                0.34                  -4%
                        10%                   0.43                0.41                  -4%
                        5%                    0.55                0.46                 -17%
                        2%                    0.66                0.59                 -12%
                        1%                    0.77                0.77                  0%
                        AEP                          Discharge Location B (Central)
                        63%                   1.14                1.13                  -1%
                        39%                   1.71                1.54                 -10%
                        18%                   2.54                2.35                  -7%
                        10%                   3.02                2.76                  -9%
                        5%                    3.69                3.60                  -2%
                        2%                    4.28                4.13                  -4%
                        1%                    4.95                4.65                  -6%

As indicated in the results, peak flows have been reduced below existing levels at both discharge locations. Therefore,
the results demonstrate that the proposed detention basins are adequate to reduce peak flows to ensure no adverse
impact due to the development.


16-001014-01 | STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP)                COOROY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, TRADING POST
| PALM LAKE RESORTS                                                                         ROAD, COOROY                  | 12
Log in to download the original file

16-001014-01A (SWMP).pdf · 13.4 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.