Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

16-001014-01A (Swmp)

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW16/0203 - 3 of 4.

of 80

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (13.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                  Overtops Embankment




Summary

Table A and B below indicate a comparison between existing and developed flood levels and
velocities within the existing channel on site.

Table A – Flood Level Comparison

 Cross Section       Ex WSL (m AHD)       Dev WSL (m AHD)         Difference (m)
       A                 98.77                 98.67                   -0.09
       B                 98.58                 98.57                   -0.01
       C                 98.30                 98.30                    0.00
       D                 97.97                 97.95                   -0.02


As indicated in Table A there are reductions in flood levels at each cross section location within the
existing swale due to the peak flow mitigation measures proposed. It is also noted that flood levels
will be significantly lower since they overtop the left channel embankment and sheet flows across
the site boundary (under both existing and developed conditions).

Table B –Velocity Comparison

 Cross Section       Ex Velocity (m/s)    Des Velocity (m/s)      Difference (m)
       A                   0.68                 0.95                   0.26
       B                   0.73                 0.87                   0.14
       C                   0.72                 0.94                    0.22
       D                   0.69                 0.68                   -0.01


While velocities within the existing swale have been slightly increased. The design velocity is less
than 1.0m/s which is not expected to cause scour.
Log in to download the original file

16-001014-01A (SWMP).pdf · 13.4 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.