Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Sallie Strang - MCU18/0084
13. The development application could compromise public safety by encouraging pedestrian access along a section of Pomona Kin Kin Road which is not suited to such access. The applicant quotes the close proximity to the Noosa trail (2) as a reason that people may want to stay in the proposed motel villas. The development property does not front the trail and access to this trial would require walking or riding mountain bikes or perhaps horses along Pomona Kin Kin Road to the north. Given the alignment and nature of the existing verges along this section of roadway it is suggested that such access should not be utilized by pedestrians on in the interest of public safety. 14. ‘The proposed development will increase my current concerns that | have in relation to security of my rural outbuilding. My rural outbuilding which is essential to my equine use, is located about 30 metres away from my boundary fence which is about 26 metres from the closest proposed motel villa. | have already had 3 recent incidents of intruders on my property attempting to break into my outbuilding. The positioning of six (6) motel villas within such a short distance of this outbuilding with my house 280 metres away will increase the chance of more intrusions. | am concerned about security around my rural outbuilding with up to say 24 itinerant people staying within such a short distance of my rural outbuilding. 15. The proposed use may result in a reverse amenity situation whereby visitors in the adjoining non- rural use, if approved, may complain that my current rural uses are creating a nuisance. My house on my property relies on solar power whereas my outbuilding adjacent to the proposed motel villa relies on a small mobile quiet petrol generator as it main source of power. There can be a number of reasons why | may need to use my outbuilding night or day in association with my rural uses. The applicant’s house is located about 250 metres from this outbuilding. Already these neighbours have complained about the small mobile generator operating at 3pm. | utilize the generator to charge the batteries connected to my inadequate solar system at the outbuilding so | can maintain my rural uses, lights, water pump for water and for the toilet which is connected to an advanced septic system. | also use that area between my outbuilding and the proposed motel villas for the farrier working on my horses. It is reasonable to assume the potential for such complaints would increase dramatically if visitors paid to stay in motel villas that were between 50 and 75 metres away from my rural outbuilding when the landowners who suggest that they operate a farm, complain about my small quiet generator operating at 3pm of an afternoon when they are 250 metres away. We were told by the neighbor, that we can run that generator at the outbuilding in between the hours of 10 or 11am and 2pm. | believe they want to curtail our use of the generator to hours that are between potential future checking out and checking in times. They have not been approved for the development yet but they are already telling us how we need to modify our behaviour to accommodate their proposed non-rural use of rural land and affect my ability to continue to operate on my rural land. 16. There is a concern that the people visiting the proposed motel villas could decide to enter my property and as a result | will face increased liability in the case of trespass. 10|Page Council Reference: MCU18/0084
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Sallie Strang - MCU18/0084Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.