2019-09-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   10 SEPTEMBER 2019




                                                        Page 45 of 76

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                            10 SEPTEMBER 2019

                                                                                    Visual Impact Assessment
                                                                                          PEA 1802 of 2019

          Table of Contents
          1     Introduction and Background one nee ene            eee ene nen nnn neeeneeneeeneeeneeeetneneeeenennee
          2     The Visual Comte nt ooo nee c eect ec eee tne nen naneenneneneeneeeeee nneennenaeeeneeenenanesneeteanesneetneeeneesennnee &
                ZL    The Locality nee e cee enee nen nen nena eens nneennenenenensnenseeeneeeneesnesnnesnecsnensnenseetesesaeeseee O
                QQ    The Streetscape nee eeeneeenee eee nnn enna eaennneenneeneenneeseennnerneeenereeanereeneee LL
                2B    The Butibediag    nna neta eneneneene eens enennenennnenanennenneetneesnennesneesnensnenseeeneeeneenseene LZ
          3     Potential Visual Impacts —_       nen              teen ene enenneenentneeeneenennnenenereeneetneeeeeeeeee LB
          =     Come siO MS one ene                        nnn nee neennennneeneennentneaenneennetenesnnenetereees LT
          Figure Index
          Figure 1 - The proposed sign. o-oo.       eee eee nen    tenn nnn een eneennennennenetneenneeneesneesneneeeteesteeseeeneee
          Figure 2 — Aerial image showing location and context of the subject site. 2
          Figure 3 - Tradeliink at 10/100 Reme Street. nnn eneneeenenenenenceetneeneetneeneee D
          Figure 4 - Storage First - 78-80 Reme Street 28 n oe          een nena nneenneeneeeneennenneeneeeneenenee B
          Figure 5 - Aerial image indicating approximate visual catchment of the subject sign...      8B
          Figure 6 - Aerial image identifying viewpoints for Figures 7-11 below. eee
         Figure 7 - View towards subject site from Rene Street from north-east of the site (VP1). Sign not
                      WISI       eee eee              een een   ene tneennenenetneennenaenaneeeeetnennneneeneesnetneeeneeteermneenee D
         Figure 8 - View towards subject site from Rene Street from north of the site (VP2). Sign partly visible
                     but would be obscured by any development on vacant land to north of the subject site... 10
         Figure 9 - View towards subject site from Rene Street from north of the site (VP3). Sign visible but
                      would be obscured by any development on vacant land to north of the subject site. ........... 10
         Figure 10 - View towards subject site from Rene Street from north-west of the site (VP4)_
         Figure 11 - View towards subject site from Rene Street from west of the site (VPS). Sign generally
                     ODSCUT ER. on nee              een         nnee eneenneeneeeneesneetseteeteneeneesneesneestereteereeneeee LL
         Figure 12 — Existing view toward the Actrol building with the proposed sign in place. ...........--.....-..... 14
         Figure 13 - Photomontage from Figure 12 viewpoint showing the approved signs... 14
          Figure 14 - Existing view toward the Actro! building with the proposed sign in place... 15
          Figure 15 - Photomontage from Figure 14 viewpoint showing the approved signs...            1S
         Figure 16 - Diagram illustrating size perception of proposed sign compared to approved sign. This
                     exercise considers sign height only. The comparison of sign length is not possible
                      presents squarely to the viewpoint. 2c eee eens LG

                                                                                                  3o0f 17

                                                                                                      Page 45 of 76