Original source · versioned page text
2019-09-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 SEPTEMBER 2019
Page 75 of 76
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 SEPTEMBER 2019
Grant assessment
Assessment is undertaken under three categories, each with several criteria with weighted scoring.
Applications must at least pass all categories for consideration (for example, a really strong environmental
outcome may not be funded for a project that represents poor value for money or has no partnerships).
1. ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES (5096)
. To what extent does the project contribute to achieving outcomes and targets of the Noosa
Environment Strategy? (25)
© The proponent will identify how the project will contribute to the outcomes identified in
the Noosa Environment Strategy. Projects that relate to multiple outcomes, or projects
with a highly significant contribution to a particular outcome, will score highly.
© The proponent will also identify whether the project will directly support the achievement
of identified targets and implementation actions identified in the Strategy.
. To what extent does the project contribute towards other conservation outcomes (such as
international agreements, threatened species management plans, etc.)? (5)
© The proponent will identify how the project will contribute towards the achievement of
other Noosa Council environment-related plans and strategies (such as the Noosa River
Plan, Pest Management Plan, Koala Conservation Action Plan) and other non-Council
environment-related plans and strategies (such as international agreements, threatened
species management plans, national strategies etc.).
© The proponent will identify how the project will contribute towards the achievement of
other Noosa Council non-environment strategies, such as the Social Strategy and Local
Economic Plan.
. Does the project demonstrate best practice environmental management? (10)
© The proponent will identify the methodology for the project and provide evidence of the
why this approach was taken over other possible methodologies. Projects that show a high
likelihood of success, based on the consideration of a range of possible options, will score
highly.
. Is there a clear indication of how the success of the project will be measured and evaluated,
using quantitative measures where appropriate. (10)
© The proponent will provide a clear monitoring and evaluation methodology as part of the
project that may include qualitative and quantitative measures. This will indicate clear
thinking about what the success or otherwise of the project looks like.
©. It may be appropriate to link the achievement of the milestones, measured as part of this
monitoring and evaluation, to annual payments for the project.
Page 75 of 76See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.