Original source · versioned page text
2019-09-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 SEPTEMBER 2019
Page 76 of 76
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 SEPTEMBER 2019
2. DEVELOPING PARTNERSHIPS (25%)
. Are multiple groups involved in the delivery of the project, and to what extent are they
collaborating? (18)
© The project application will identify all groups involved in the project and in what capacity?
Collaboration and projects that have meaningful contributions, through cash or in-kind
contribution, by multiple groups will score highly.
. Does the project involve community participation opportunities? (7)
© The project application will identify what opportunities will be available for general
community involvement in the project, beyond just the membership of the applicant
organisations. This may include information provision through media releases (lower
scoring) to field/open days, to genuine participation opportunities (higher scoring).
3. VALUE FOR MONEY & ORGANISATIONAL CAPACITY (25%)
. The percentage of the total project costs being sought as part of the grant. (10)
© The proponent will identify how much cash and in-kind contributions will be made by the
proponents or other parties towards to the overall cost of the project. Applicants that are
able to provide a significant level of contribution will score highly.
© Applicants may include the ability to leverage the funds with other future grant
opportunities, if they can demonstrate a previous history or evidence of a commitment to
this.
. Does the proponent have the demonstrated experience and organisational capacity to manage
the delivery, finance and reporting on the project? (8)
© The proponent will provide evidence of their ability to manage the project with
demonstrated experience in similar projects of a similar scale in the past.
oO The proponent will provide evidence of what management structures they will have in
place to support and manage the project they are applying for.
. Does the proponent have the ability to maintain the program/project at the end of the funding
period? (7)
© The proponent will demonstrate how the project or program will be maintained or
continued following the end of funding being provided by Council.
Page 76 of 76See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.