Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-09-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

of 76

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   10 SEPTEMBER 2019




                                                        Page 76 of 76

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                          10 SEPTEMBER 2019

    2.     DEVELOPING PARTNERSHIPS (25%)
    .     Are multiple groups involved in the delivery of the project, and to what extent are they
    collaborating? (18)
               ©   The project application will identify all groups involved in the project and in what capacity?
                   Collaboration and projects that have meaningful contributions, through cash or in-kind
                   contribution, by multiple groups will score highly.

    .      Does the project involve community participation opportunities? (7)
               ©   The project application will identify what opportunities will be available for general
                   community involvement in the project, beyond just the membership of the applicant
                   organisations. This may include information provision through media releases (lower
                   scoring) to field/open days, to genuine participation opportunities (higher scoring).

    3.     VALUE FOR MONEY & ORGANISATIONAL CAPACITY (25%)
    .      The percentage of the total project costs being sought as part of the grant. (10)
               ©   The proponent will identify how much cash and in-kind contributions will be made by the
                   proponents or other parties towards to the overall cost of the project. Applicants that are
                   able to provide a significant level of contribution will score highly.
               ©   Applicants may include the ability to leverage the funds with other future grant
                   opportunities, if they can demonstrate a previous history or evidence of a commitment to
                   this.

    .      Does the proponent have the demonstrated experience and organisational capacity to manage
    the delivery, finance and reporting on the project? (8)
               ©   The proponent will provide evidence of their ability to manage the project with
                   demonstrated experience in similar projects of a similar scale in the past.
               oO  The proponent will provide evidence of what management structures they will have in
                   place to support and manage the project they are applying for.

    .      Does the proponent have the ability to maintain the program/project at the end of the funding
    period? (7)
               ©   The proponent will demonstrate how the project or program will be maintained or
                   continued following the end of funding being provided by Council.

                                                                                                   Page 76 of 76
Log in to download the original file

2019-09-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda(PDF, 5MB).pdf · 4.8 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.