Council archive · source document
Properly made submission (object) Brett Kennedy MCU13/0171
Very large file (11.0 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
I am concerned that the level of the area around the proposed factory may also be
raised and not just the factory floor itself. Given the very near miss that my house had in the
major floods in 2012, I am concerned that any lifting of soil profiles downstream of my
house, even by as little as l5cm, may be enough to increase the very real risk of my house
being flooded. As such, to ensure my safety and the safety of my property, I ask that the
exact height of the level of the floor of my house be surveyed by council and that
any land
that is below that level on the Wimmers property never be built up in any way. This is a
reasonable request given that the property is downsteam in the path of a watercourse that
regularly floods. I also request that the past steps that have been undertaken to raise the
soil levels of extensive areas in the now Wimmers property be undone. I feel that they also
are a real and present danger to my safety and property in flood events. This is also a very
reasonable request. Wimmers did not cause these problems but they have inherited them.
The proposed building itself is also of concern to me. The current structure is open in
that it is unwalled. This means that any floodwaters that broach the level ofthe wall that it
is built on could then spread out.
The proposed building is a walled and enclosed structure. Given its expansively tall,
broad and lengthy dimensions and the angle that it sits at with regards to the angle that
flood waters enter the property, it is entirely conceivable that it would also act as a weir or
buffering wall and slow the flow of such floodwaters. As such, the building itself could very
conceivably increase the risk of flooding in my property and in so doing also threaten my
safety and the safety of my property.
I have seen floodwaters roar into the Wimmers property on many occasions. Debris
has in the past choked the fence at the front of the property and the weight of the water
and debris has at times tipped parts of this fence over. Bricks in the storage yard at Gate 4
have been washed from the top of pallets that were stacked on top of other pallets. The
brick safety railings for the bridge at the back of this storage yard have been washed away
by the force of the floodwaters. One interesting piece of debris very near to the "subject
site" came from my property. A piece of wood became stuck in the bottom of the metal
bridge that crosses the creek from the area at gate 3 and leads to the proposed new factory
site. It lodged there in one of the first floods that occurred just after I moved in to my
property. This piece of wood bears the axe marks that I put in it when I cut it up for fire
wood. Floodwaters have very nearly broached the levy/rock wall at the foot of the building
that is referred to as the "subject site." Floodwaters have blocked the driveway that is
marked as the main access to the site and left debris on the driveway near the floor level of
the current building.
Flood debris can still be found in the barbed wire in my fence and I am happy to
show anyone where this debris is. Had a neighbour not come down when I was building my
house and told me to move the positioning of my house markedly to the south, it would
have been flooded on a number of times. I will be forever grateful to them for sharing their
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Properly made submission (object) Brett Kennedy MCU13/0171Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 11.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.