Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report

of 118

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Evaluation of Gully Pit Inlet Litter Control Systems– Brisbane City Council and Gold Coast City Council

                3.3 Tray Basket


                The tray basket insert (Appendix A) was tested for capture and hydraulic
                performance under similar conditions.


                Test results and observations:


                Litter capture performance.
                On-grade
                •    40% of the litter added to the approach flow (25L/sec) was retained
                     in the basket for all on-grade longitudinal slopes.
                •    Once the basket became blocked nearly all (90%) of pollution added
                     thereafter bypassed the basket.
                •    At the steeper (12%) grade the basket was more effective in capturing
                     the litter.
                •    As the approach flow increased, the litter capture performance of the
                     basket was marginally better at the 12% grade than for 1% and 4%.
                     However, when subjected to an approach flow of 330L/sec, only 2%
                     of the pollution was retained in the basket for all grades.


                Sag
                •    The pit was bisected for the sag test to simulate flow from opposing
                     directions (see Figure 5). The basket retained 80% of the litter with
                     the approach flow set at 50L/sec. However it did not retain any of the
                     larger plastic litter.




                Urban Water Resources Centre              12             University of South Australia
Log in to download the original file

RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report.pdf · 15.7 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.