Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Evaluation of Gully Pit Inlet Litter Control Systems– Brisbane City Council and Gold Coast City Council
3.3 Tray Basket
The tray basket insert (Appendix A) was tested for capture and hydraulic
performance under similar conditions.
Test results and observations:
Litter capture performance.
On-grade
• 40% of the litter added to the approach flow (25L/sec) was retained
in the basket for all on-grade longitudinal slopes.
• Once the basket became blocked nearly all (90%) of pollution added
thereafter bypassed the basket.
• At the steeper (12%) grade the basket was more effective in capturing
the litter.
• As the approach flow increased, the litter capture performance of the
basket was marginally better at the 12% grade than for 1% and 4%.
However, when subjected to an approach flow of 330L/sec, only 2%
of the pollution was retained in the basket for all grades.
Sag
• The pit was bisected for the sag test to simulate flow from opposing
directions (see Figure 5). The basket retained 80% of the litter with
the approach flow set at 50L/sec. However it did not retain any of the
larger plastic litter.
Urban Water Resources Centre 12 University of South Australia
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.