Original source · versioned page text
26 0116 - Change Req Letter
Attached to the e-mail Lodgement of Minor Change Application - MCU174/0559.05.
Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 500 Rev 22 (dated 10
January 2024)
3D Perspectives – Unit 16 prepared by H4 Delete
Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 501 Rev 22 (dated 10
January 2024)
Details – Unit 16 Planter Box prepared by Retain
H4 Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 900 Rev 22 (dated
10 January 2024)
Details – Unit 16 Planter Box prepared by Delete
H4 Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 901 Rev 22 (dated
10 January 2024)
Conditions of approval
Current wording of Condition 5:
‘The landscape planter boxes, as detailed on the approved plans, must be provided to the area adjacent to the rumpus
room and bedroom 2 of both dwelling units (northern and southern elevations). The planter boxes must not be removed’
Proposed wording of Condition 5:
‘The landscape planter box, as detailed on the approved plans, must be provided to the area adjacent to the rumpus
room and bedroom 2 of dwelling unit 1 (northern elevation). The planter box must not be removed’
Compliance with the Planning Act 2016
Assessing and Deciding Application for Minor Changes
In accordance with s81 of the Planning Act 2016, when assessing the Change Application, the responsible entity
must consider—
(a) the information the applicant included with the application; and
The proposal is considered to have provided all documentation to facilitate the processing of the application.
(b) if the responsible entity is the assessment manager—any properly made submissions about the
development application or another Change Application that was approved; and
The original development application (MCU17/0559) and all subsequent Change Application’s did not receive
any properly made submissions.
(c) any pre-request response notice or response notice given in relation to the Change Application; and
Not applicable. A pre-request response notice was not requested or given.
(d) if the responsible entity is, under section 78(3)(ba) or (bb), the Minister—all matters the Minister would or
may assess against or have regard to, if the Change Application were a development application called in
by the Minister; and
Not applicable. The responsible entity is not the Minister.
(da) if paragraph (d) does not apply—all matters the responsible entity would or may assess against or have
regard to, if the Change Application were a development application; and
Assessment Benchmarks
The original development application was lodged and was assessed against the now superseded Noosa Plan
2006 (the Superseded Scheme).
The original development application was assessed against the following Superseded Scheme codes:
Page 4 of 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original