Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

26 0116 - Change Req Letter

Attached to the e-mail Lodgement of Minor Change Application - MCU174/0559.05.

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

 Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 500 Rev 22 (dated 10
                       January 2024)
         3D Perspectives – Unit 16 prepared by H4                                    Delete
 Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 501 Rev 22 (dated 10
                       January 2024)
         Details – Unit 16 Planter Box prepared by                                   Retain
 H4 Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 900 Rev 22 (dated
                     10 January 2024)
         Details – Unit 16 Planter Box prepared by                                   Delete
 H4 Plan + Design + Build – Plan No. 901 Rev 22 (dated
                     10 January 2024)
 Conditions of approval
 Current wording of Condition 5:
 ‘The landscape planter boxes, as detailed on the approved plans, must be provided to the area adjacent to the rumpus
 room and bedroom 2 of both dwelling units (northern and southern elevations). The planter boxes must not be removed’

 Proposed wording of Condition 5:
 ‘The landscape planter box, as detailed on the approved plans, must be provided to the area adjacent to the rumpus
 room and bedroom 2 of dwelling unit 1 (northern elevation). The planter box must not be removed’

Compliance with the Planning Act 2016

Assessing and Deciding Application for Minor Changes
In accordance with s81 of the Planning Act 2016, when assessing the Change Application, the responsible entity
must consider—

(a)   the information the applicant included with the application; and

The proposal is considered to have provided all documentation to facilitate the processing of the application.

(b)   if the responsible entity is the assessment manager—any properly made submissions about the
      development application or another Change Application that was approved; and

The original development application (MCU17/0559) and all subsequent Change Application’s did not receive
any properly made submissions.

(c)   any pre-request response notice or response notice given in relation to the Change Application; and

Not applicable. A pre-request response notice was not requested or given.

(d)   if the responsible entity is, under section 78(3)(ba) or (bb), the Minister—all matters the Minister would or
      may assess against or have regard to, if the Change Application were a development application called in
      by the Minister; and

Not applicable. The responsible entity is not the Minister.

(da) if paragraph (d) does not apply—all matters the responsible entity would or may assess against or have
     regard to, if the Change Application were a development application; and

Assessment Benchmarks
The original development application was lodged and was assessed against the now superseded Noosa Plan
2006 (the Superseded Scheme).

The original development application was assessed against the following Superseded Scheme codes:


                                                                                                          Page 4 of 8
Log in to download the original file

26 0116 - Change Req Letter.pdf · 651 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.