Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

09/0982 - Op Works - Prescribed Tidal Works - Extensions to Jetty [As Published] · 142009.982

of 48

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

SECTION 4 Section 4 must be completed when the application seeks Spprovel to cary out o, operational work,
PLANNING SCHEME ag. i. ;

 

 

 

 

41 ls the proposed operational work assessable under any State ® planning regulatory provisions?
CINo

If no, is the proposed operational work assessable under the planning scheme?

oO No - Goto Q4.2 | YeS — Complete Form 1, Part E and answer Q4.1.1 - 4.1.7 below

 

 

  

 

 

tes .
If yes, is the proposed operational work-assessable under the planning scheme?
[LI] No = Answer Q4.1.1- 4.1.7 Yes — Complete Form 1. Part € and answer Q4.1.1 - 4.1.7 below
I STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD, at
814:1.4 “Ils any’part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled rc road, or F within 100m of a State-controlled road?
No

does it exceed the threshold?
CINo (2 Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (OMR) as Concurrence Agency.

(1 Yes

If yes, is all of the proposed operational work associated with either -

« — Reconfiguring a lot that increases the total number of lots, or increases the total ruber ot lots

  

: . aS 7 . my
ok x . 7 . . a
«. 7 _ tino. - Aniswer (a) - “bow cm

 

(a) Is any of the proposed operational work associated with’access to a State-controlled toad?

(b) 4s any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?

Clno = LYes

If yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
1" No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency
Ol, Yes:; This application must be referred to OMR as Advice Agency.

 

Pep, Ono ‘L1Yes ,

“IL yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State- conirolted toad not defined by route?
oO No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads {OMR) as Cohcuménce Agency. ‘

4 : 1 Yes - This appiication must be referred to OMR as Advice Agency. . . .

 

fan, schuadule 2 tae 2. dams 3 1? 410) ~

 

No «+ | Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (oMR) Bs Concurrence Agency.

*

oT]. abutting the State- controlled road eke ot . . foe

If no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in integrated Planning Regulation 1 998, schedule 5 and

+  Amateriat change of use that is assessable under the planning scheme; or - : Ono 'C] Yes

we (c) “Does any of the proposed operational work involve the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land,
“f through a pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625cm? that directs stormwater to a State-controlléd road?

 

 

  

ACID SULFATE SOILS

 

 

Oey {opment involving Acid Sulfate Soils?
[No~ Gotoas.t3 (J Yes

‘If yes, is the natural ground level of any point where work is being carried out less than 20m AHD?
CINo CL] Yes

It yes, does the proposed operational work involve the following?

{i} Excavating more than 1,000m# of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD

{ii) Filling the premises with 1,000m® or more of material with an average depth of 0.5m on
land, soi! or sediment at or below 5m AHD

 

iabie A hea €, Slats

 

 

 

4.1.2 {Is any 0 of the operational work proposed i in a local government area a isted* ‘in State Planning Foley 2/02: Planning and Manegig

    
 

LNo Cyes *

f

oP
7 gh tt
If yes to either or both (i) or (ii} above - This application must to be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as *
Advice Agency

 

 

 

4) Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Burnett. Caboolture, Cairns, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Miriam Vale, Mornington, Noosa, Pine _ a

Rivers, Redcliffe, Rediand, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday
Page 27

2 gts,

   
   

Ban

wor

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.6 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

09_0982 - Op Works - Prescribed Tidal Works - Extensions to Jetty [As Published].pdf · 2.6 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.