09/0982 - Op Works - Prescribed Tidal Works - Extensions to Jetty [As Published] · 142009.982

 

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

 

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

VEGETATION CLEARING; KOALA CONSERVATION (outside SEQ urban footprint); WILD RIVER AREA

 

43B

 

 

Is afty of the proposed operational work for the clearing of native vegetation to which the Vegetation Management Act 1999 applies?
No -Gotoa44 L1 Yes

‘tf yes, is the proposed clearing assessable (i.e. not an exception) under schedule 8, part 1, table 4 of the IPA?
CINo-Gotoass  L1Yes

If yes, is the proposed vegetation clearing a relevant purpose under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, section 22A

for one or more of the following?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(i) A project declared to be a significant project under the State Development and Public Works [[_]No |(J Yes
Organisation Act 1971, section 26

(ii} Necessary to control non-native plants or declared pest CNo jC} Yes

(ili) To ensure public safety : C)No |[) Yes

(iv) For establishing a necessary fence, firebreak, road or vehicle track, or for constructing Cino | Yes
necessary built infrastructure, if there is no suitable alternative site for the fence, firebreak,
road, track or infrastructure

(v) Anatural and ordinary consequence of other assessable development for which a (no |O1 Yes
development approval as defined under the Planning Act was given, or a development .
application as defined under the Planning Act was made, before 16 May 2003

(vi) For fodder harvesting CINo {C1} Yes

(vii) For thinning CNo jC) Yes

(vii) For clearing of encroachment vt sey ve ut LINo O Yes

(ix) For an extractive industry ” (No |[1Yes

(x) For clearing regrowth on leases issued under the Land Act 1994 for agriculture or grazing Cino |) Yes
purposes ae Se

(x) For clearing regrowth on freehold land, or ‘indigenous ini ina awild tiver high present Lino {C1 Yes
-atea wee . ce

 

If no to all (i) - (xi) above - The clearing is not a relevant purpose and the Assessmen! Manager must refuse fo recelve the application,

If yes to any one of (i) — (xi) above, is the proposed clearing associated with a material change of use or reconfiguring a
tot for which referral is weaned in relation to clearing vegetation (ie. did you answer 'yas' to all questions in either Q2.1.4 or Q 3.3)?

C1 Yes - Goto 04.4
oO No - Answer (a) {b} and (c} on the next page of this Checklist.

 

Page 30