09/0982 - Op Works - Prescribed Tidal Works - Extensions to Jetty [As Published] · 142009.982

     

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

| ASSOCIATED WITH RECONFIGURING ALOT. RESIDENTIAL, “COMMERCIAL OR, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INA WILD RIVER
AREA~:

42 Is any’f the proposed operational work associated with reconfi iguring 2 a alot and the reconfiguration i is also assessable?
CAN Gotoo.3 (_]Yes

        

 

If yes, is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

oO No - (Complete Form 1, Part } If the premises are completely within a single toca! government area, the operational work associated with reconfiguring
is assessed by the local government.
(1 Yes

If yes, is the proposed operational work for residential, commercial or industrial purposes outside a designated urban area,
as defined by the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

No - (Complete Form 1, Part E) if the premises are completely within a single focal government area, the operational work associated with
reconfiguring is assessed by the focal government,

O Yes (Complete Form 1, Part E) ifthe premises are completely within a single local government area, the operational work associated with
* reconfiguring is assessed by the local government, and subject {o.the declaration for the relevant wild river area, assessment by the local
government is required for the purposes of the Wild Rivers Act 2005.

wt % table 3, 2em 1¢c}. Wed Rivers cade iicte. the code doas nol cami

       
  
 

contain appizahle provsions for msxienta!

 

 

434, any pant of the premises i in an interim koala habitat protection area?
: 0 - Go to. 04,38 Yes

1... Ifyes, is the proposed operational work for clearin

+ planning regulatory provisions (koala regulatory pI

~ EINo-cotoosas [1 Yes. cee " a

‘ If-yes, does the following apply?

| |() the proposed clearing is for a domestic activity, as defined in

| the koala regulatory provisions 3

the proposed clearing is for a building or structure of less than 500m?
gross floor area

‘iy the proposed clearing will result in -

° the clearing of less than 2,500m? of native |
vegetation, as defined in the koala regulatory i
. provisions; and | ‘

|
{
| * — no.loss of mature koala habitat trees, as defined in
i
i

tive vegetation, as defined in draft. South East Queensiand Koala State

   

ClYes
Ces |
(Dyes |

   

 

 

the’ koala regulatory provisions.

 

|
i(iv) the proposed clearing is consistent with a development approval |
for a material change of use, reconfiguring a lot or operational i
work that has not lapsed, where 1
* the application for the development approval was |

made before 12 December 2008 ; or
* — the development approvai was given under Division i

2 of the draft South East Queensland Koala State
ing ing regulator

  

 

       

   

 

If no,to all of (i) - iv) above - The proposed operational work for clearing native vegetation may not occur and an application involving that! -
component cannot be made. *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*? Native vegetation is defined in the draft South East Queensland Koala State planning regulatory provisions. The term ‘clearing’ has the meaning given in the integrated
Planning Act 1997, schedule 10 (dictionary).

Page 29