Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

2016-09-12 General Committee Agenda

of 19

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

ATTACHMENT 2




Page 10 of 19

Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
                       .      e                      \                                {                                          >)                     |           L          flea        ge                                                 {                                z           __@           :
         Portion                                A         -     Road                        Reseal                             &          Rehabilitation                                                          -      Road                       Resurfaci ng
    ContractNo: «1617 TOZD

                                                                       PRICE
                                                                  “Monee |                      F—-—-—F—F— +--+
                                                                     Night Rate)
                                                                                                0        '        2        »        0        8        7)      n         ~       %0
No. |NAME OF TENDERER                                               (excl of GST)               Unacete           ve Pe           Poo               Gen               Ver Good         Econo
 1                                                                              S38
 3   [Stanley Macadam Pty Ltd                                   LS                              The ratings
 4                                                                                              +0 (zero) = Unacceptable — a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
 Bp                                                                                             + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
 6 PO                                                          Po                               + 40 (forty) = Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
                                                                                                * 60 (sixty) = Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
     NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                                     + 80 (eighty) = Very Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
   Cn                                                           Do not evaluate                 * 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional — the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
    De                                                              not evaluat
                                                                                                Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
                                                                                                            Number of Tenders Evaluated          =    CL? _]

                                                                                1                    2                     3

   Evaluation Criteria                      werewrwe cn | in| “een [rns                          “owe | rn           | “een
                                                                           Resultant             Resultant              Resultant
                                                                            weighting                ghting             weighting
   Capabiliy & Resourcing                  | mm | oo                      |e |                                        =
     comnetpeincescency                  |         om        |      0     |» (oem)                   » [wm                °
    oe
    Ca ee                                                                                                            | 8
    feamasawy it mt
     cwormnesmeno                           | (em                              = |» |                         om             |
   Contoton          otal eon                                                oe
     Total Technical Score                         70%    J 82.275                          81525                 8S
     Normalised Technical Score (Tn)                            LO
     PART 8 Pc een                                              ee                      ee
                                                                       Vo                Allroad  Surfaces     tanley Macadam
     Total Fees (Pc)                                30%                     8                   4                    570
     Average Fees (Pav) $............cccceecee
     Price Score                                                                                                     60
     Normalised Price Score (Pn)                                                                                     48
     Weighted Price Score (Pw;
     Total Score of price and non price
     elements
     OTHER DETAILS
          Assesment panel member 1          Cameron Shields - A/Works Coordinator, Planning & Infrastructure
          Assesment panel member 2          Steve Deschamp - Assistant Supervisor - Plant, Planning & Infrastrucutre              The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
          Assesment panel member 3 —_—- Matthew Sanderson - HR Officer - WH&Safety, Executive Office                                                   Contract Administrator's signature:
          Assesment panel member 4          David Shing - Technial Officer - Coastal and Foreshores, Planning and Infrastructur
          Assesment panel member 4          Allan Hull - Civil Operations Manager, Planning & Infrastructure

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Page 10 of 19
Log in to download the original file

2016-09-12 General Committee Agenda(PDF, 2MB).pdf · 1.7 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.