2016-09-12 General Committee Agenda

Page 11 of 19

Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
                                                                 .*                 —               nm *           —       q   .                   :                      a                   Pr          s
                                                 Portion                           B -         Mill                &       Fill          -     Road                    Resurfacing

                                                             PRICE
                                                       [8 based on Mill &
                                                       Fill OG44 (320)(0-
                                                          45mm) x 106]
No, |NAME OF TENDERER                                    (excl of GST)            0         7)       2         0         46        x          x        n                   51       %
 1                                                                               Unacceptala         Vary Poe           Poor                Sone               ‘Vary Good         Euaptors
 2
 3                                                                                ‘The ratings
                                                                                  *@ (pero) = Unacceptatée ~ a tal for fat criteria. and extreme risk
                                                                                  + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor — eo contest of Be submission for thal efteria 6 of a low slaedard and tigh Got
                                                                                  #40 (forty) = Poor — te contert of @e sebrimsin for fat créers & urenipressive and poses a mocersie oat
                                                                                  +0 [sety) © Good « fhe coment of fre subrnission for frat crmerta is mertable and wil need fo be mortored # awarded
    NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                        +20 (eighty) = Very Good = the content of the setynission tor Mat orteria sof a high standard and advantapeoes
                                                    EE                            ES ier
                                                                                 Once all he data ib entered he reseltant scones based 08 The price and son pre clerments are autoeratoaly calculaed for you
                                                                                            Number of Tenders Evaluated    =   [3 ]

                                                                    i                 2                  3

   cwnuton Cr                         were           |    as| Sy [S| ay | 208 | su, |                             een ecoproac             namin
                                                       Score (out         Score (out        Score (out            Downer have a minumim daily qty specified and the prices are more
                                                               8             TT 7                   TTF | anars- portions to Downer and Atroad with no guarantee of
                                                               | oa |             | a               | 75 |       projects. This will enable Downer to do any mil and fill associated
                                                               sf                    = [se | 58 |                 Sinimomnonnce nora
                                                                                                                  with the overlay program and Afroads can do mill and fil associated

                                                                                                    7

                                                                                  a
    Tota! Technical Score                              Pp    eeFS PST
    Normalised Techewcal Score (Tn)                       rr         es       ee |          se
   PART     Pre    men                                        ee             ee
                                                             Jo             Jiroad Surtac    Stan    Macad.
                                                          Tae were             as  AU             ry  aw
     aie                                              pF
    Average Fees (Pav) $      cee
   Normatoed                                  Po fe Te
    Normalised Price Score (Pn)                               100                                   83
    Weighted Price Soore (P
   Total Score of price and non price
     Boe Pree ts
   OTHER DETAILS
         Assesment panel member 1
        Assesment panel member 2                                                                             The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
        Assesment panel member 3                                                                                               Contract Administrator's signature:
         Assesment panel member 4
         Assesment panel member 4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Page 11 of 19