3365 261022 report · RAL19/0014.01

One wonders why connected properties have not been included in Council’s PIA?
Relating to the subject property, it could be suggested the reason for exclusion
considered only the broadbrush vegetation mapping and did not at all consider
provision of infrastructure, whether or not a priority for the area.



1.5    LONG TIME FAMILY OWNERSHIP / DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE

Lot 496 was purchased by Donald and Ellen Leape and their residence built upon it
in the 1970s. The family, including young daughters Erica and Karen, made the
residence their home in late 1976. The parents remained resident in the home for
the remainder of their lives, Donald passing in 2002 and Ellen in late 2025. Erica
and Karen are now tenants in common, with Erica occupying the home.

Ellen was the applicant for the reconfiguration application made in May 2019. Her
intention was always to use her land in the manner best for family members, and the
then proposed zoning change to Rural Residential forced her hand.

A small 5 additional lot subdivision was proposed, with access either off Pottery
Street or via an access easement. Ellen would continue to reside in her home (Lot
E) below, with daughter Erica to build on Lot F and hence be available to care for
Ellen in her twilight years. Other lots would be sold or built upon by daughter Karen
or other extended family.




Plate 7 – Proposed Subdivision as initially submitted to Council (Source Brian Naismith)

                                             10