Original source · versioned page text
SBSMR 20004 Revision D - Response to RFI
6.4 RESULTS
The outcome from the MUSIC modelling for the developed mitigated and developed
unmitigated scenarios are shown in the following tables.
Developed Developed Load Reduction Required Load
Pollutant Type
Unmitigated Mitigated (%) Reduction (%)
TSS (kg/year) 749 59.6 92.5 80
TP (kg/year) 1.48 0.225 84.8 60
TN(kg/year) 7.51 3.15 58 45
Gross Pollutants
67.5 0 100 90
(kg/year)
Table 5 - Pollutant Load Reduction Results –Bio Retention Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of 200
Developed Developed Load Reduction Required Load
Pollutant Type
Unmitigated Mitigated (%) Reduction (%)
TSS (kg/year) 749 88 88.9 80
TP (kg/year) 1.48 0.324 78.1 60
TN(kg/year) 7.51 3.95 47.4 45
Gross Pollutants
67.5 0 100 90
(kg/year)
Table 6 - Pollutant Load Reduction Results –Bio Retention Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of 50
The load reduction achieved meets the minimum load reductions from the Guidelines. Given
the proposed development will meet the water quality and quantity objectives it is considered
that the development complies with Noosa Council’s stormwater requirements.
NMA-SBSWMR-20004 Noosa Youngcare 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.