Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-22 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 22 OCTOBER 2015
Page 17 of 20
Attachment 2 - Tender Evaluation Matrix
Final Evaluation
Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
e , ; . Be eO a a a ln I a
Portion A - Asphalt - Road Resurfacing and Rehabilitation
[Contacte 75167035
omer: ieee
PRICE ($ m2 0G14
PMB Night Rate) ee
Ao RANE OF TENDERER et eat ° oo ome 8 8 em wom
1 |Allons Asphalt nacceptatie Very bow Pee eat Very Geos baeveona
2 [Allroad Surfaces
3 [Australian Paving Services 0 SY The ratings:
4 Downer infrastructure |. $2] +0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
§ [Tropic 8B + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
6 + 40 (forty) = Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
Ff + 60 (sixty) = Good ~ the content of the submission for that criteria Is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
By + 80 (eighty) = Very Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
Of + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional - the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
a
10 ‘Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
92
93
6
95
DID NOT TENDER FOR PORTION Number of Tenders Evaluated = [5 ]
uift Tok 0 fDevclinedt To Offer |
[Road Surfaces Group
1 2 3 4 5
IDESCRIPTION Resultant Resultant Resultant Resuttant Resultant
INB. Amend the below to match your Beer rout | “Seorex | SEO OH | Seon | SEM] eorex | S04 | “score | SOOM | "score
Probity Plan Criteria exactly + weighting weighting weighting weighting weighting
Contract Experience @ Capacity | tom fo] se mee Pate Poot es Toe
Methodology tm | 4s | | 4s | | 8 | | 8 |
a Oe |e | o } es [ols |
Meatnasatety | tome tw | | s jm | es |
onmtiontoton'eovom [em —_—| [28 | Pan
Total Technical Score 0 Po 88.05 GG
Normalised Technical Score (Tn) LO
PART Pre ste [nies apa [ nnd sac [ MMBRERIOG | oS [one
Total Fees (Pc) 30% 56 546 54 548 548
Average Fees (Pav) $.........cccccceses $48
Price Score 83 104 114 99 99
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 73 92 100 87 87
Weighted Price Score (Pw)
Total Score of price and non price
elements
OTHER DETAILS
Assesment panel member 1 Cameron Shields
Assesment panel member 2 Allan Hull
Assesment panel member 3 John McCarron
Assesment panel member 4 David Shing The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
QBSA LICENCE CHECKED (if applicable) Contract Administrator's signature:
Copy of Portion A - 201516T038 Evaluation Workbook xIsx Page 1 20/10/2015See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.