Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-10-22 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

of 20

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA   22 OCTOBER 2015




                             Page 19 of 20

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                                                                                      22 OCTOBER 2015

                                                                                                                                    Final Evaluation

                                                                                               Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
                                                          Portion C - Spray Sealing - Road                                       Resurfacing and                     Rehabilitation

                                                   ee
                                       No, | NAME OF TENDERER                                      excl of GS             t—+—_}+—_+—_+—_+_+_+_+"++H
                                        1 [Allens Asphalt                                                  S53]           Semen           a a             =        =      =        ”      aa        i"   wane
                                        4 [Downer infrastructure SSSSSSCCTCCCC*dT SSSSCCSCSC~SS                 |          + 0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~a fai for that crteria and extreme risk
                                        5 |RPQ Spray Seat                                                 S17]             *+ 20 (twenty) = Very Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
                                        6 [Tropic                                                           874            * 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
                                        7 [Road Surfaces Group —SCCCCdSCSSSCSCSCSC~C~S                                     +60 (siaty) = Good - the content ofthe submission for that entra is mertable and wal need to be montored # awarded
                                              ag                                                                           + 80 (eighty) = Very Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
                                                                                                                           + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional - the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
                                        , |                                                  |
                                                                                           a         eee                  Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
                                        =
                                        93                                                                                 "Pricing based on square meter rate mutiphed by 100 (10mm PMB)
                                        OSS
                                        90    ar
                                            NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                                                              Number of Tenders Evaluated     =   [7 ]
                                           Le A ee
                                                                                                            7                  2                  3                 4                  5                6                 z
                                           —                                                   ni                 an tate]                                 tc, | ween | re | Mae
                                           Same [vmemen | ir] Ses [er] S|                                                                   | Ses       |r] [ee                                ee
                                          IDESCRIPTION                                                   Resultant          Resultant          Ri                Re                Resuttant         Res:               Res:

                                               i                                              i         za                                    |:                 ee:               es |              |           ey
                                                                                                               |                            | +                  i:                                                      4 |
                                          Total Technical Score                     i         [3325 |e CdTCCCYCCSSTCSCCSSCTCCSNGC*SSCC CS
                                          Normalised Technical Score (Tn)               LSA                       TOO
                                           anne                                                                                     ee ee Ee
                                                                                    -
                                           Price Score                                                 105                97               cr)                 105               114              99                 91
                                          Normalised Price Score (Pn)                                  91                85                  78                 91               100              87                  79
                                          iWeighted Price Score (Pw,
                                           OTHER DETAILS
                                              Assesment panel member 1        Cameron Shields
                                              Assesment panel member 2           Allan Hull
                                              Assesment panel member 3         John McCarron
                                              Assesment panel member 4          David Shing                      The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
                                           QBSA LICENCE CHECKED (if applicable)                                                      Contract Administrator's signature:           Sa

       Copy of Portion C - 2015167038 Evaluation Workbook (4).xisx                                                                       Page 1                                                                                                                         20/10/2015
                                                                                                                                                                        Page 19 of 20
Log in to download the original file

2015-10-22 Ordinary Meeting Agenda(PDF, 2MB).pdf · 1.6 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.