Original source · versioned page text
Part RFI - odour modelling.pdf
Issue Information required Katestone Recommended Response
The analysis of the site-predicted 10. Supply of the requested PRTMET Katestone has provided the requested file (NoosaSprings_Prtmet.DAT) in a separate email
meteorology included in Figure 4 to file is requested to assist in review of this dated 23 August 2021. The windrose for the site indicates that six percent of winds are less
Figure 7 of the Katestone report matter. Provide justification as to than 1 m/s at the site.
does not appear to appropriately whether the assessment has suitably
summarise the frequency of calm considered calm/ low wind speed
wind speeds which are an import conditions.
consideration of potential odour
impacts.
A review of the predicted odour 11. Supply of timeseries of predicted Katestone has provided an excel spreadsheet (AMG_NewPlan_Results.xlsx) containing a
contours identifies the 2.5 odour odour concentrations for each receptor timeseries of the predicted odour concentrations at the hotel buildings and outdoor recreation
unit contour is immediately is requested for review of potential odour areas in a separate email dated 23 August 2021.
adjacent the proposed impacts the accommodation building
accommodation building with little and at the outdoor recreation areas.
buffer. The tabulated results in
Table 5 identify that 2.5 odour units
is predicted at the accommodation
building.
Further clarification is required with 12. Please describe how the results for Predicted odour concentrations for the hours when recreational areas are allowed to be
respect to odour predictions the reduced hours for the outdoor occupied were generated as follows:
provided for outdoor recreation recreation areas was generated, i.e 1. Removed 1-hour concentrations for hours when recreational areas were not occupied. (e.g.
areas. removal of predicted concentrations for the tennis court hours 9pm to 6am, for the swimming pool hours 8pm to 6am)
from unoccupied hours and 2. Calculate 99.5th percentile on the remaining hours.
regeneration of 99.5th percentile or
maximum?
13. For Figure 12 and Figure 13, clarify The location (508.697kmE 7078.109kmS) is representative of the outdoor recreational areas.
the location of the receptor(s) used to It is located between the pool and tennis courts. The figures included all hours of the year
generate these figures, eg (8760 hours). (The timeseries data (Odour_met.csv) is provided in a separate email dated 23
accommodation or outdoor recreation August 2021.)
areas.
Katestone Environmental Pty Ltd 23 August 2021
GH Australia – D21030-1-1 - Noosa Springs Boutique Hotel Page 3
[OCR of page images]
Issue
Information required
Katestone Recommended Response
The analysis of the site-predicted
meteorology included in Figure 4 to
Figure 7 of the Katestone report
does not appear to appropriately
summarise the frequency of calm
wind speeds which are an import
consideration of potential odour
impacts.
10. Supply of the requested PRTMET
file is requested to assist in review of this
matter. Provide justification as to
whether the assessment has suitably
considered calm/ low wind speed
conditions.
Katestone has provided the requested file (NoosaSprings_Prtmet.DAT) in a separate email
dated 23 August 2021. The windrose for the site indicates that six percent of winds are less
than 1 m/s at the site.
A review of the predicted odour
contours identifies the 2.5 odour
unit contour is immediately
adjacent the proposed
accommodation building with little
buffer. The tabulated results in
Table 5 identify that 2.5 odour units
is predicted at the accommodation
building.
11. Supply of timeseries of predicted
odour concentrations for each receptor
is requested for review of potential odour
impacts the accommodation building
and at the outdoor recreation areas.
Katestone has provided an excel spreadsheet (AMG_NewPlan_Results.xlsx) containing a
timeseries of the predicted odour concentrations at the hotel buildings and outdoor recreation
areas in a separate email dated 23 August 2021.
Further clarification is required with
respect to odour predictions
provided for outdoor recreation
areas.
12. Please describe how the results for
the reduced hours for the outdoor
recreation areas was generated, i.e
removal of predicted concentrations
from unoccupied hours and
regeneration of 99.5th percentile or
maximum?
Predicted odour concentrations for the hours when recreational areas are allowed to be
occupied were generated as follows:
1. Removed 1-hour concentrations for hours when recreational areas were not occupied. (e.g.
for the tennis court hours 9pm to 6am, for the swimming pool hours 8pm to 6am)
2. Calculate 99.5" percentile on the remaining hours.
13. For Figure 12 and Figure 13, clarify
the location of the receptor(s) used to
generate these figures, eg
accommodation or outdoor recreation
areas.
The location (508.697kmE 7078.109kmS) is representative of the outdoor recreational areas.
It is located between the pool and tennis courts. The figures included all hours of the year
(8760 hours). (The timeseries data (Odour_met.csv) is provided in a separate email dated 23
August 2021.)
SS
eee ee
nvironmental Pty Ltd
ERR Noosa Springs Boutique Hotel
23 August 2021
=
ee
eee ee ee
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Part RFI - odour modelling.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.