Original source · versioned page text
Part RFI - odour modelling.pdf
Issue Information required Katestone Recommended Response
14. Provide further justification for not Section 6 of the air quality assessment describes the reasoning. That is, odour emissions
including odour emissions from the inlet from the inlet works were not included as odours were not detected a short distance from the
works in the assessment. source. This observation is consistent with the fact that the inlet works is enclosed to facilitate
capture of odours and treatment via a biofilter.
Odour emissions from the biofilter were measured and included in the dispersion modelling
study.
The odour emission rates adopted 15. Describe the dispersion parameters Characterisation of the sludge loadout sources is provided in the table below.
for the assessment identify that and representation of the sludge Sludge loadout was assumed to occur at 5am in the morning based on operational advice
sludge has a high emission emission source in the modelling to from the Noosa Waste Water Treatment Plant.
potential but was not sampled at validate the predictions undertaken for Source Type Effective Initial horizontal spread Initial vertical spread
the plant. this source. height
m m m
Transfer from conveyor to hopper 4 2 1
Hopper 4 8 1
Drying belt 4 1
16. Provide justification as to why the Odour sampling was undertaken on 13 December 2017. Standard operations were occurring
odour sampling undertaken for the at the Noosa Waste Water Treatment Plant at the time of sampling. The Noosa WWTP has a
purpose of the reporting is relevant to biofilter which minimises emissions and makes them more consistent. The only activity that
odour emissions at all times. Is the odour was not occurring was the sludge loadout due to the time of the day and, therefore, emissions
emission sampling representative of for this source were obtained from the literature.
worst case emissions? Emissions from the sampling have been compared to those reported in the Sydney Water
Database for WWTPs. A summary is provided below. The emissions from Noosa WWTP are
of the same magnitude or greater than the literature.
Sydney Water Database
Noosa WWTP
Source Average Maximum
(ou/m2/s)
(ou/m2/s) (ou/m2/s)
16.8 (anaerobic)
Bioreactor 0.77 4.7 2.6 (anoxic)
1.3 (aerobic)
Digester 0.20 1.0 1.2
Clarifier 0.12 1.1 5.4
Sludge
17 22 17
loadout
Katestone Environmental Pty Ltd 23 August 2021
GH Australia – D21030-1-1 - Noosa Springs Boutique Hotel Page 4
[OCR of page images]
Issue Information required Katestone Recommended Response
14. Provide further justification for not | Section 6 of the air quality assessment describes the reasoning. That is, odour emissions
including odour emissions from the inlet | from the inlet works were not included as odours were not detected a short distance from the
works in the assessment. source. This observation is consistent with the fact that the inlet works is enclosed to facilitate
capture of odours and treatment via a biofilter.
Odour emissions from the biofilter were measured and included in the dispersion modelling
study.
The odour emission rates adopted | 15. Describe the dispersion parameters | Characterisation of the sludge loadout sources is provided in the table below.
for the assessment identify that and representation of the sludge | Sludge loadout was assumed to occur at 5am in the morning based on operational advice
sludge has a high emission | emission source in the modelling to | from the Noosa Waste Water Treatment Plant.
potential but was not sampled at | validate the predictions undertaken for | | Source Type Effective | Initial horizontal spread | Initial vertical spread
the plant. this source. height
m m m
Transfer from conveyor to hopper 4 2 1
Hopper 4 8 1
Drying belt 4 1
16. Provide justification as to why the | Odour sampling was undertaken on 13 December 2017. Standard operations were occurring
odour sampling undertaken for the | at the Noosa Waste Water Treatment Plant at the time of sampling. The Noosa WWTP has a
purpose of the reporting is relevant to | biofilter which minimises emissions and makes them more consistent. The only activity that
odour emissions at all times. Is the odour | was not occurring was the sludge loadout due to the time of the day and, therefore, emissions
emission sampling representative of | for this source were obtained from the literature.
worst case emissions? Emissions from the sampling have been compared to those reported in the Sydney Water
Database for WWTPs. A summary is provided below. The emissions from Noosa WWTP are
of the same magnitude or greater than the literature.
Sydney Water Database Noosa WWTP
Source Average Maximum (ou/m2/s)
(ou/m?/s) (ou/m?/s)
16.8 (anaerobic)
Bioreactor 0.77 4.7 2.6 (anoxic)
1.3 (aerobic)
Digester 0.20 1.0 1.2
Clarifier 0.12 141 5.4
Sludge
ioadout 7 22 7
Se
1 Environmental Pty Ltd
OL Noosa Springs Boutique Hotel
ee
28 Agus! 202) / LE
ee
ee
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Part RFI - odour modelling.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.