Council archive · source document
Cover Letter, DA Form 1, Plans, Owners Consent, Coastal Environment Assessment · OPW21/0049
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW21/0049 - Noosa Spit Erosion Protection Works.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Noosa Spit Coastal Protection Environmental Assessment 18
Potential Impacts
It is intended that dredging will occur between 7am and 10pm; if nuisance noise is recorded by
residents, the complaint will be investigated and mitigation measures, such as changed hours of
operation will be put in place.
5.6 Lighting Impacts
Marine turtles are particularly sensitive to artificial lighting during nesting and hatching (which occurs
in November to March). The activity of the CSD (and light created) is minor in nature when
considering existing light sources (boats, waterfront properties), and would not be expected to impact
on marine fauna.
5.7 Interactions between Dredge Plant and Marine Fauna
Marine animals that swim near the water surface, such as turtles, could interact with the marine
dredge plant. Large vessels/plant such as the dredger are slow-moving, which would provide marine
fauna time to evade the moving vessel. Smaller, higher speed vessels (e.g. tenders) represent a
higher risk of vessel strike. However, support vessels would represent a small proportion of the total
number of local boat movements compared with recreational vessels and represent a comparatively
low risk on this basis. In addition, speed limits will be placed on quicker moving support vessels.
Entrainment within a CSD can also be a potential impact on turtles. This occurs when animals
become drawn into the dredge as a result of the suction applied through the process of removing
sediments from the sea floor (entrainment). The adoption of soft start guidelines for dredge
operations should reduce this risk. Entrainment should be considered as unlikely due to the suction
field of influence being less than one metre (during dredging) and protocols in place to only activate
the drag heads when near the seabed.
It is not considered that vessel strike or entrainment as a result of the project will pose a significant
risk to marine fauna, particularly as the dredge area is not considered significant habitat for any
marine fauna of concern.
5.8 Introduced Pests
It is expected that the dredge plant will be locally sourced/based (from within Queensland or the
eastern coast) and will not be a vessel that undergoes regular movements to other ports containing
marine pests. On this basis, the project represents minimal risk from the perspective of introduced
marine pests.
5.9 Maritime Safety
Because of the shifting nature of the sands at the mouth of the river, no navigational beacons have
been installed. The dredging contractor will put temporary measures in place during dredging (i.e.
hazard lights at night) to reduce the risk of vessel collision; a maritime navigation safety plan will be
prepared for the construction phase. There is no intention at present to provide any additional
navigational markers following completion of works.
G:\Admin\A10342.g.mpb.NoosaSpitSEMPdesign\03 approvals\R.A10342.002.00_Environmental
Assessment.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Cover Letter, DA Form 1, Plans, Owners Consent, Coastal Environment Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
L.A10342.001.cover letter_lowres.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 9.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.