Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

07/2238 - MCU - Service amd Utility Tpye 3 - Tower [As Published] · 132007.2238

of 104

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

 

 

 

 

State-controlled road matters 2. The application involves: {tick applicable box/es}
oo mare nomen wee eee oor C) devetopment on land contiguous’ to a State controlled road and for -
ou answered “noni e “to 02, . ; .
the apptcaton riggers referral to the Department (1 (a) material change of use assessable against the planning scheme;
of Main Reads saieepevenlaneatieh - [2] (b) reconfiguring a fot unless -
srency wile Father aleunsoncee DMR wi « the total number of lots is not increased; and —
be a concurrence agency. « the total number of lots abutting the State-controlled road is not increased;
Schedule 2a he IF Regulation vil assist you to (1 (¢) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the
concurrence agency for the application. planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)—
* associated with access to a State-controlled road; or
« for filling or excavation; or
¢ involving the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land, through a
pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625 cm? that directs stormwater to a
State-controlled road.
C1 (ii) development on land not contiguous to a State-controlled road and -
(1 (a) material change of use -
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
¢ mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule;

CO (b) reconfiguring a fot for a purpose mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP regulation

and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule;

(1 (c) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the

planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)-
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
« mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule.
Ld (iii) none of the above
Clearing vegetation 3. The application involves: (tick applicable box/es)
For mora information refer to Guide 12, ® (i) material change of use -
Unless you answered ‘none of the above" to Q3, : . .
the appcaton requires assessment by the {a) assessable against the planning scheme;
agpunontof Mea Resour and Wait (b) on alot containing -
(NRW). :
itan agency other than NRW is the assessment sa category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of assessable vegetation; or
manager for the application, NRWisa « if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot - remnant vegetation;
Ganeurrenee agency forthe appication in relation (c) where the existing use of the land is a rural or environmental use; and
Ifyou ticked Q3()) or (ii), your application requires (d) where the size of the land is 2 hectares or larger - complete Part J of Form 1
Teferral to NRW for assessment regardless of C1 (ii) reconfiguring a lot -
whether vegelation clearing is proposed or not. _

(a) on alot containing a category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of
assessable vegetation or, if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for
the lot, remnant vegetation;

(b) where the size of the lot before the reconfiguration is 2 hectares or larger;

(c) where 2 or more lots are created; and

(d) where the size of any lot created is 25 hectares or smaller - complete Part J of Form 1

(iii) operational work -

(a) for the clearing of native vegetation where the vegetation clearing is made
assessable under Schedule 8 of the IPA; and

(b) not associated with a material change of use assessable against the planning
scheme mentioned in (i) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii) - complete Part J of
Form 1

Ed (iv) none of the above.
Strategic port land 4. The application involves:

For more information refer to Guide 11,

If you ticked (i) - the relevant Port Authority is the
assessment manager fos the application.

Hf you ticked (ii) Queensland Transportis a
concurrence agency for the application.

 

(CJ (i) development on strategic port land as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (TI
Act} - complete Part | of Form 1

C1 (ii) a material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan approved under the
TI Act for the strategic port land - complete Part ! of Form 1

EX (ili) none of the above

 

4 Land contiguous to a State-controlted road is defined in schedule 14 of the IP Regulation to mean tand - if part of the land is within 100m of the State-controlled road, or that is part of a future State-

controlled road.

Page 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2238 - MCU - Service amd Utility Tpye 3 - Tower [As Published].pdf · 5.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.