Information Response · MCU24/0120

Page 2

                            Figure 1: Traffic Engineering Recommendations Plan

Item 2

Provide amended civil works plans.

Response: Please refer to the revised Engineering Plans prepared by SCG Consulting Engineers. The
standard of infrastructure conditioned by MCU20/0024 and OPW20/0055 has been maintained. The
footpath has been removed from all specialist documentation.

Item 3

Remove the structure from the front setback.

Response: The Unit 2 arbour has been reduced in size and will be setback 3.005m from the southern
front boundary. The arbour is a lightweight and open structure and will include climber planting to
visually soften the development in accordance with the Landscape Plans. In accordance with AO6.1 of the
Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code, the arbours also assist with providing a clearly identifiable
entry area to units. The table below shows the original versus revised design outcome.




                                                                                                      2

Page 3

                Original Design                                        Revised Design




Item 4

Provide increased soft landscaping setback of a minimum of 2 metres.

Response: Refer to the Architectural Plans. The Unit 2 pool setback has been increased to 2m.
Accordingly, deep landscaping has been provided. Refer to Figure 2 below.




                                  Figure 3: Amended landscaping plan

Item 5

Provide revised fencing plan and address the above-mentioned outcome.

Response: Refer to the Architectural Plans. Fencing has been reduced to show a maximum height of
2m. Refer to Figures 3 and 4 below.




                                                                                               3

Page 4

                                         Figure 3: Proposed fencing




                                         Figure 4: Proposed fencing

Item 6

Provide revised gross floor area calculations in compliance with the Performance outcome
PO11 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code and administrative terms.

Response: The Architectural Plans have been revised to relocate the laundry within the garage of each
unit. The Unit 2 entry and upper level ensuite/walk-in-robe has also been reduced. The GFA Calculation
Plan (Drawing No. DA.21) has been revised in light of Council’s Information Request, and now includes
the level transition areas raised by Council. The revised plan confirms that the proposal can achieve a plot


                                                                                                          4

Page 5

ratio of 0.4:1 in accordance with AO11 of the Medium density residential zone code. The key changes are
annotated in red, and have been extracted in Figure 5 below.




                                        Figure 5: GFA Plan Revisions

Item 7

Provide revised plans showing the developments site coverage from a birdseye view rather
than per storey for clarity.

Response: Refer to Drawing No. DA.19 within the revised Architectural Plan set, confirming a proposed
site cover of 40% from a birdseye view.

Item 8

Provide revised landscaping plans noting the above-mentioned items.

8.1. Increase the landscaping width between the side boundaries to suitably accommodate
and support the establishment of soft landscaping.

8.2. Remove outdoor seating area from contributing to soft landscaping calculations.

Response: Refer to the revised Architectural and Landscape Plans. The originally proposed gravel along
the northern side boundary has been replaced with a garden. More landscaping is proposed along the
eastern side boundary, particularly adjacent to the drying/services areas.

Outdoor seating has been removed from the soft landscape calculations, and the increased landscaping
as described above results in a total of 67.42% landscaping proposed, exceeding the 60% requirement.

Item 9

Provide clarification regarding the notation and provide an amended plan.

Response: Refer to revised Engineering Plans. This annotation has been removed from the plans.

We thank Council on behalf of the applicant for assessing the attached additional application material.



                                                                                                          5

Page 6

Based on the information provided in this application we respectfully request that Council proceed to
issue an approval.

Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned.

Yours faithfully,
Adapt Development Management Pty Ltd




Tiani Boulton
Director
E: [email protected]
M: 0404 924 160




                                                                                                   6