Town Planning Report

     within the Avocet Road frontage. Access to the units is proposed via formalised gatehouses resulting in
     clearly defined access points to the development (refer to Figure 6 below). In terms of bin storage and
     mechanical plant, separate areas are provided for each dwelling, which are screened from view form
     adjacent properties, as well as the site frontage.




     Figure 7 Perspective view of built form (Source: DCM Building Design 2022)


14. Table 2 below provides a comparison of the Approved Development the Proposed Changed development
    by way of key development parameters.

     Table 2 Comparison of Approved Development VS Proposed Changed Development
      Parameter              Approved                             Proposed                      Compliance
      Building Height        2 storey (not exceeding 8m)          2 storey (not exceeding 8m)   Yes
      Gross Floor Area       299m2                                383m2                         N/A
      Site Cover             ≈37%                                 ≈41%                          No
      Setbacks              Front (south & west) – 4.31 metres    Front – 4.5 metres            Yes
                            Side (east) – 2 metres                Side (east) – 1.5 metres      No
                            side (north) – 2.89 metres            Side (north) – BTB            No




15. It is noted that majority of the above-mentioned built form outcomes generally complies with the
    development parameters prescribed by the planning scheme. The non-compliances as a result of the
    proposed development are discussed in section 5.3.1 below.


3.2 Proposed Reconfigure a Lot (Boundary Realignment)
16. Please refer to the Proposed Survey Plans prepared by Skyline Surveyors in Appendix 3. As demonstrated,
    the proposal seeks to realign the existing boundaries, such that existing Lot 1 on SP215946 & Lot 2 on
    SP215946 comprise of the majority of the site, with only the ‘actual’ common property being designated
    as this purpose (group title lot)

17. In doing so the realignment of boundaries ensures a more definitive ownership of land. The proposal
    maintains common property to a minimized extent to ensure both lot 1 & Lot 2 have equitable use rights
    to the permanent waste storage area and entrance.

18. As demonstrated in Table 3 & Figure 7 below the proposed boundary realignment will produce the
    following lot sizes:

   ASTP 220311                                                                                               Page 8 of 19