Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Susan Davis - MCU18/0019
NOOSA COUNCIL Notice of Submission
To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
1. be made to the assessment manager ~ 1'~0.~
2 be in writing <'~ ~~
3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made el on I~ol' ~ <:)
4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submis' ~~ ~ CO ~'b
0", ~-?
5. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why .•• ~ '>;- C7
6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period . r.~_Z-
As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including Individual details, are published on Council's website
and therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not
they are properly made.
1. Application details
i File No. MCU181 0019
I Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville
I
, Nature of Proposed Development. Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility)
-----~-----~
2. Submitter details
I Full name of Submitter
! Postal address
I
I Suburb
I Signature(s)
3. Details of Submission
! I (We), make the following submission:
II object to the proposed development for the following reasons.
Reasonable expectation
I When I purchased my house in Val Crescent I had no expectation that a 90 bed aged care facility would be built in this
! quiet residential street This expectation was totally reasonable given that Val Crescent is zoned for detached houses
!only.
The proposed development is in direct conflict with the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive
. community consultation. The community expects that the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development
'Which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed development A development that would be consistent with the
planning scheme would be expected to be 11 dwellings over 11 lots, which is a very different to a 90 bed aged care
facility which is commercial in nature.
I~-----------------------~
IAmenlty
!
i The proposed development will have a significant adverse impact on my amenity.
I The size, mass and bulk of the proposed 90 bed aged care facility (which is basically one continuous building along the
I entire side of Val Crescent) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by detached houses.
,
i The residential character of Val Crescent and the Immediate area will be substantially diminished. The proposed
I development will fundamentally change the nature and character of Val Crescent which has no units or other rrultiple
I housing.
Privacy
Council will use any personallnfonnation provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining In contact With you. Councills authorised to collect
tills Information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your pelllOnallnformation Is only aocessed by
pelllOns authorised to do so. Your personal information Is dea~ with in accordance with councirs privacy policy.
WNW ooosa.gld goy. au I mail@noosa old aOV au T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Old 4565
I ABN 97 969 214121
Page 1 of 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
-
Ir---
iTraffic and access to site
I As the main commercial entrance to the site will be via Val Crescent, the proposed development will have a negative
I traffic impact on Val Crescent as It will result in a significant increase in vehicles using the street, particularly commercial
vehicles.
The additional traffic generated by the proposal will include commercial vehicles such as delivery trucks, vans and trade
I vehicles.
, 12.5m long heavy rigid vehicles will also need to access the site, as well as refuse collection trucks.
'I Val Crescent is a quiet local road and is only intended to service residents who live in the street. There are no footpaths
on either side of Val Crescent and the street Is used for walking on by the local residents (and also all the people who I
, currently park in the street to access the hospital). The increased traffic on the street will make this more dangerous, II
'I particularly for the chiidren and the senior citizens.
The site access for commercial vehicles, staff and visitors on Val Cr is inappropriate. It is located near the roundabout and I
directly opposite three residential driveways. There will be an increased risk that vehicles and trucks accessing the
I proposed site will have an accident with other vehicles, cyclists or pedestrians. ,
i i
I Car parking !
IThe section of Goodchap St near the Noosa Hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car I
: parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for the hospital's staff, patients and visitors. A gO bed facility
, directly across the road which has up to 35 staff and visitors will exacerbate this problem with more and more people
; parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.
I While the proposed development will have a basement car park, I believe it will not be sufficient to meet the car parking
! needs of the facility at peak times.
,
Construction
I
I The Val Crescent residents will have to endure the constant noise, dust, machinery operation and trucks of building the i
Ifacility for at least 14 to 16 months. This is not the building of a detached house we have to put up with, but a major
Iconstruction site directly opposite our homes. This is unreasonable given that we live in a detached housing zone.
I
,.------------_._----------------------~
1 Need I
IIunderstand the need for more aged care facilities on the Sunshine Coast, however, they should be located on a more
~proPriate site. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for this development.
I
i
~.:LO\t:!\_~9\J\~ *,~s._~f1\U\Lk.-h:>_::lk..fotto.v..i(l.j':
~~-~-~_~-~.~~!~-L~-.
rc~----
l-
i
~__ ~L.~_k~,(,,_W;U-'_d..J!~~~~C<.dy
91.lr_('nc.d'C0c.-fh,.t... __
~-.fu.-~J-ND-~\.~J!.\-L-CO-~~J:bLp..':Y~-G9.!Y~c[u--'-
~w1Mitn_~~-wJ.L~f\;tt~~ .~_bcJJf-_rt'lo_..t&c
,_bQ.~._M
:
cv~*'-~
__ ~-\~~-p~~-'%-
t-1J.Ij~J~_--t-Y'PwJ-,
!o_~</QJ __dYvLvtj_~'~'"
9.UQ[Q«"olQ.-
M;a1-
.ri--fb.----J,
10 fbL._t--RCl k,v.~" ~ofWl.- dv~t W,Jj
( r>
CI"?-
fdow
I
!
t~~~;-l~
fll t9l
~ c;~bJ;4&~4r~~t~~
VWl pi 1/--.L uJ oeJ So. 0. A. J ~ Iv\- V'£).r l-t Cf 17 '
Page 2 of 2
Used in these records
PM Submission Object - Susan Davis - MCU18/0019Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.