Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission Object - Susan Davis - MCU18/0019

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

-
Ir---
iTraffic and access to site
I As the main commercial entrance to the site will be via Val Crescent, the proposed development will have a negative
I traffic impact on Val Crescent as It will result in a significant increase in vehicles using the street, particularly commercial
  vehicles.
    The additional traffic generated by the proposal will include commercial vehicles such as delivery trucks, vans and trade
I vehicles.
,             12.5m long heavy rigid vehicles will also need to access the site, as well as refuse collection trucks.

'I Val Crescent   is a quiet local road and is only intended to service residents who live in the street. There are no footpaths
   on either side of Val Crescent and the street Is used for walking on by the local residents (and also all the people who          I
, currently park in the street to access the hospital). The increased traffic on the street will make this more dangerous,           II

'I particularly for the chiidren and the senior citizens.


    The site access for commercial vehicles, staff and visitors on Val Cr is inappropriate. It is located near the roundabout and       I
    directly opposite three residential driveways. There will be an increased risk that vehicles and trucks accessing the
I   proposed site will have an accident with other vehicles, cyclists or pedestrians.                                             ,

i                                                                                                                                       i
I Car parking                                                                                                                           !
IThe section of Goodchap St near the Noosa Hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car                  I
: parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for the hospital's staff, patients and visitors. A gO bed facility
, directly across the road which has up to 35 staff and visitors will exacerbate this problem with more and more people
; parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.

I While the proposed development will have a basement car park, I believe it will not be sufficient to meet the car parking
! needs of the facility   at peak times.
,

    Construction
I
I The Val Crescent residents will have to endure the constant noise, dust, machinery operation and trucks of building the               i
Ifacility for at least 14 to 16 months. This is not the building of a detached house we have to put up with, but a major
Iconstruction      site directly opposite our homes. This is unreasonable given that we live in a detached housing zone.
                                                                                                                                        I
,.------------_._----------------------~
1 Need                                                                                                                                  I
IIunderstand the need for more aged care facilities on the Sunshine Coast, however, they should be located on a more
~proPriate site. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for this development.
                                                                                                                                          I

i
~.:LO\t:!\_~9\J\~                   *,~s._~f1\U\Lk.-h:>_::lk..fotto.v..i(l.j':
  ~~-~-~_~-~.~~!~-L~-.
rc~----
l-
     i
               ~__                    ~L.~_k~,(,,_W;U-'_d..J!~~~~C<.dy
                                                                                         91.lr_('nc.d'C0c.-fh,.t... __


~-.fu.-~J-ND-~\.~J!.\-L-CO-~~J:bLp..':Y~-G9.!Y~c[u--'-
~w1Mitn_~~-wJ.L~f\;tt~~          .~_bcJJf-_rt'lo_..t&c
,_bQ.~._M
:
         cv~*'-~
              __ ~-\~~-p~~-'%-
t-1J.Ij~J~_--t-Y'PwJ-,
                    !o_~</QJ __dYvLvtj_~'~'"

         9.UQ[Q«"olQ.-
                            M;a1-
                                               .ri--fb.----J,
                            10 fbL._t--RCl k,v.~"                        ~ofWl.- dv~t W,Jj
                                                                                                                       ( r>
                                                                                                                   CI"?-
                                                                                                                       fdow
                                                                                                                                          I
                                                                                                                                          !




t~~~;-l~
  fll t9l
          ~ c;~bJ;4&~4r~~t~~
            VWl pi                         1/--.L   uJ oeJ So.   0. A.     J ~    Iv\-   V'£).r   l-t Cf 17 '

                                                                                                                          Page 2 of 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.0 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Susan Davis - MCU18_0019.pdf · 1.0 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.