Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-05-24 Special Meeting Agenda

of 35

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA                                                                     24 MAY 2017


In considering how to proceed Council needs to consider its options and the best way forward from
a strategic, financial and operational perspective. To assist with this process, four potential options
are outlined below for Council’s consideration. Each option has been subjected to a SWOT
analysis.

Option 1: Council does not purchase the property and allows the camping ground to
          continue to operate as it currently does

 Strengths                                            Weaknesses

    Lowest cost option.                                Continued environmental degradation of Johns
                                                           landing and the Noosa River;
                                                         The social issues at Johns Landing continue to
                                                           multiply as Ben Johns becomes progressively
                                                           less able to manage the camping ground;
                                                         Council by not enforcing its DA conditions by
                                                           default becomes complicit in allowing the above
                                                           mentioned environmental and social issues to
                                                           grow.

 Opportunities                                        Threats

    Nil.                                               In order to progress their retirement plans the
                                                           Johns family sell the land to a developer who
                                                           proposes a major development;
                                                         On-going damage to the Noosa brand
                                                           particularly on social media from visitors to
                                                           Gagaju who are concerned by the conditions
                                                           they encounter on their visit;
                                                         A sudden forced transition for residents if the
                                                           land is bought by a third party.


Option 1 is a continuation of the status quo. It potentially sees the environmental and social issues
at Johns Landing continuing or escalating and exposes Council to serious reputational risks as a
result of inaction. Therefore, it is not recommended.


Option 2: Council does not purchase the property however moves to enforce the DA
          conditions

 Strengths                                            Weaknesses

    Relatively low cost option;                        Continued environmental degradation of Johns
    Ongoing damage to the Noosa brand reduced;           landing and the Noosa River;
                                                         Questions are likely to be raised as to why
    The social problems at Johns Landing cease to        Council has not previously enforced its DA
      multiply and decrease overtime;                      conditions;
    Council enforces its DA conditions.                The environmental values of the land are not
                                                           protected by Council ownership (but the current
                                                           protections under the Biodiversity Overlay would
                                                           continue);
                                                         No deadline for conditions to be enforced.




                                                                                            Page 9 of 42
Log in to download the original file

2017-05-24 Special Meeting Agenda(PDF, 5MB).pdf · 4.9 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.