Original source · versioned page text
2017-05-24 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 24 MAY 2017
In considering how to proceed Council needs to consider its options and the best way forward from
a strategic, financial and operational perspective. To assist with this process, four potential options
are outlined below for Council’s consideration. Each option has been subjected to a SWOT
analysis.
Option 1: Council does not purchase the property and allows the camping ground to
continue to operate as it currently does
Strengths Weaknesses
Lowest cost option. Continued environmental degradation of Johns
landing and the Noosa River;
The social issues at Johns Landing continue to
multiply as Ben Johns becomes progressively
less able to manage the camping ground;
Council by not enforcing its DA conditions by
default becomes complicit in allowing the above
mentioned environmental and social issues to
grow.
Opportunities Threats
Nil. In order to progress their retirement plans the
Johns family sell the land to a developer who
proposes a major development;
On-going damage to the Noosa brand
particularly on social media from visitors to
Gagaju who are concerned by the conditions
they encounter on their visit;
A sudden forced transition for residents if the
land is bought by a third party.
Option 1 is a continuation of the status quo. It potentially sees the environmental and social issues
at Johns Landing continuing or escalating and exposes Council to serious reputational risks as a
result of inaction. Therefore, it is not recommended.
Option 2: Council does not purchase the property however moves to enforce the DA
conditions
Strengths Weaknesses
Relatively low cost option; Continued environmental degradation of Johns
Ongoing damage to the Noosa brand reduced; landing and the Noosa River;
Questions are likely to be raised as to why
The social problems at Johns Landing cease to Council has not previously enforced its DA
multiply and decrease overtime; conditions;
Council enforces its DA conditions. The environmental values of the land are not
protected by Council ownership (but the current
protections under the Biodiversity Overlay would
continue);
No deadline for conditions to be enforced.
Page 9 of 42
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.