Original source · versioned page text
2021-11-15 GC Agenda - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan
The original of this document is very large (11.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Shire Council
Having gathered information on potential adaptation options, an important next step in the project was
to undertake more detailed and rigorous socio-economic analyses (known as a cost-benefit analysis)
of the short-listed options using a range of social, environmental and economic criteria, data and other
information. This component was critical to informing the selection of the adaptation actions presented
in this plan.
For the most part, options included for this final stage of analysis were those that scored highly
within the ‘Investigate Further’ category. In addition, based on feedback from Council staff and the
community, it was determined that a number of options rated as ‘Unfeasible’ should also be included to
provide greater certainty and confidence that these actions should not form part of a coastal hazards
adaptation plan for Noosa.
Reference Box #4
Understanding ‘cost-benefit analysis’
A cost-benefit analysis is a method by which organizations can analyse and compare competing
investment opportunities or decisions.
To do this, a model is built that incorporates the benefits of a particular action (e.g. investing in a
specific adaptation measure), as well as the associated costs, and subtracts the costs from the
benefits. An example of such a model is shown in the figure below. When completed, a cost-
benefit analysis will yield results that can be used to inform reasonable decisions regarding the
feasibility of a particular course of action. In the case of the CHAP, the decision tool known as
Net Present Value (NPV) is used to illustrate the long-term value of a particular project. In simple
terms, NPV is a method of calculating the total return on investment for a project or expenditure
by comparing the total benefits expected to result from the investment and translating those
returns into today’s dollars, so that a decision can be made on whether the project is worthwhile.
Organisations rely on cost-benefit analyses to support decision making because they provide an
objective, evidence-based view of the issue being evaluated – without the influences of opinion,
politics, or bias. By providing an unclouded view of the consequences of a decision, a cost-benefit
analysis is an invaluable tool for councils allocating significant resources, making decisions that
have significant consequences, and creating long-term plans.
Management Management
actions costs
Protection of Protection of Creation of public Change in change in
built assets beach open space recreational use tourism
Avoided Existence benefits Amenity Recreational Tourism
damage costs (including benefits use benefits benefits
environmental
benefits
Page 32
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.