MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love

:



    The Applicant has ccmpletely failed to address the numerous and significant potential impacts
    of the proposed Development on the adjoining School. The following specific areas of non-
    compliance are noted:


     Code Objective              Developer's Assessment       Objectors' Assessment
     RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE
    09 The subdivision layout    09 Complies:                 Does not Comply
    is designed to facilitate    The proposal will comply     The phrase "reasonably
    linkages with adjoining      where reasonably             applicable" is unclear and the
    sites in the immediate       applicable.                  specific linkages with adjoining
    area.                                                     sites in the immediate area have
                                                              not been considered or adequately
                                                              addressed.
    010 Where the lots are to    010 Complies:                Does not Comply
    be used for Industrial       Landscaped buffering has     The layout does not provide for
    business or Commercial       been provided along all      appropriate buffer areas, to
    business uses. the layout    boundaries adjoining the     mitigate possible impacts on the
    provides for appropriate     school to the east.          adjacent School. Landscape
    buffer areas. to mitigate                                 buffering is insufficient and
    possible impacts on                                       ineffective to mitigate the negative
    nearby residences or other                                impacts. including those of fugitive
    noise sensitive uses                                      emissions. of the Development.
    012 An adequate and          S12.1- 12.2 Complies         Does not Comply
    accessible water supply is   Will comply as applicable.   The Applicant has not adequately
    provided for fire fighting                                addressed the issue of fire safety
    purposes.                                                 and its potential impacts,
                                                              particularly given the proximity of
                                                              the Development to the adjacent
                                                              School.
    032 Access easements         S32.1 Complies                Does not Comply
    are in appropriate           It is considered that the    The proposed access is not
    locations for safe access    proposed access easement     appropriate for the Development
    and egress, and supply       has been designed in         and does not provide safe access
    appropriate widths and       accordance with Sections 2   and egress nor does it provide for
    levels of service for the    and 3 of PSP5 Engineering    the appropriate level of safety of
    number of vehicles that      Design Standards - Roads,    school children given its proximity
    will utilise them            Drainage and Earthworks.     to the School
    033 Traffic generated by     S33.1 Complies               Does not Comply
    the development is within    The development will         "reasonably applicable" is
    the acceptable capacity of   comply where reasonably      indeterminate. The proposed
    external roads and does      applicable.                  Development does have an
    not have an adverse                                       adverse impact upon the
    impact upon the                                           functioning of the road network.
    functioning of the road                                   The Applicant has failed to provide
    network                                                   an objective evidence or argument



                                                                                                12