MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love

Code Objective               Developer's Assessment           Objectors' Assessment
                                                             •... more than suitable." The
                                                             Applicant furthermore provides no
                                                             justification for its derived value of
                                                             30% other than it is what will fit on
                                                             the site given its proposed
                                                             configuration.

                                                             The design of the facility on the
                                                             Property as currently proposed
                                                             clearly is not suitable as the
                                                             Applicant is unable to comply with
                                                             the planning scheme and must be
                                                             rejected.
BUIDLING WORKS CODE
01 Buildings and other       51.1 Complies                   Does not Comply
structures    are            Setbacks comply with            The setbacks specified in
appropriately designed       Schedule 1.                     Schedule 1 address probable, but
and sited to- a) provide                                     not definitively compliant solutions
amenity for users of the                                     in the specific circumstances.
premises as well as                                          Given the nature of the proposed
preserve the visual and                                      Development the Applicant has not
acoustic     privacy of                                      demonstrated that structures are
adjoining and nearby land                                    appropriately designed and sited to
uses;                                                        preserve the visual and acoustic
                                                             privacy of the adjoining School.


018 Lighting associated      S18.1- S18.3 Not                 Does not Comply
with the use or works does   Applicable                       'where possible' is insufficient, an
not have an adverse                                           obfuscation, and furthermore an
impact upon the amenity      S18.4 Complies                   acknowledgement that it is not
enjoyed by users of          All lighting will comply with    possible for the Applicant in its
adjoining or nearby          the relevant requirements        current proposal to comply with
premises nor do it cause     where possible.                  relevant requirements without
unreasonable disturbance                                      qualification as required under the
to local fauna.                                               planning scheme.
                                                             The Applicant has failed to show
                                                             by any reasonable objective
                                                             justification that Lighting
                                                             associated with the use or
                                                             operation of the proposed
                                                             Development does not have cHI
                                                             adverse impact upon the amenity
                                                             enjoyed by users of the adjoining
                                                             School.




                                                                                                20