MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love

..
     Code Objective          Developer's    Assessment       Objectors'      Assessment

                                                             making them, and fails to address
                                                             the potential impacts on the School
                                                             children of the vapour emission
                                                             from the facility.
                                                             Detail provided elsewhere in this
                                                             document demonstrates             s clear
                                                             link between service station
                                                             proximity and harm to children.
                                                             The Applicant fails to address
                                                             these matters or to provide any
                                                             credible data to support their
                                                             contention.     Neither does the
                                                             Applicant does provide creditable,
                                                             or indeed any, material to show
                                                             that acceptable and safe exposure
                                                             levels can and will be maintained
                                                             during the operation of the service
                                                             station.


     LANDSCAPING      CODE

     028 Landscaping of      028 Complies                    Does not Comply
     carparking areas ...    It is considered that one      The Development         proposal is
                             advanced tree for every 6      noncompliant and not suitable for
                             parking spaces is not          the neighbourhood.
                             appropriate given that the
                             car parking area is located    The phrase "it is considered"           is
                             between the petrol building    clearly an obfuscation, without
                             and the fuel court. It is      qualification, justification or
                             considered that trees will     validation of the credentials of the
                             limit casual surveillance of   person holding the consideration.
                             this area.                     The siting of the car parking area
                                                            is the responsibility of the
                             The site comprises 30%         Applicant.      Furthermore      it is the
                             landscaping. This is           Applicant's     responsibility     to design
                             considered more than           a compliant solution in all respects,
                             suitable.                      including provision of required
                                                            trees AND sufficient casual
                                                            surveillance to comply with the
                                                            planning scheme.
                                                            Council has determined by way of
                                                            the planning scheme what is
                                                            'suitable'. The Applicant provides
                                                            no qualification, expert opinion or
                                                            justification   to allow a conclusion
                                                            that the amount proposed is



                                                                                                         19