Council archive · source document
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love
Very large file (10.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
.'
Code Objective Developer's Assessment Objectors' Assessment
not dominate the streetscape.
011 Access and egress Does not Comply
points do not impact on Given the nature of the
the safety and operations development and proximity to the
of the road system School the proposed access and
egress point does impact
adversely on the safety and
operation of the Eumundi-Noosa
Road.
014 Provision is made for 014 Complies Does not Comply
pedestrian and vehicular Can comply via condition The Applicants response is
queues at conflict points; where applicable. inconsistent and vague. The
Development will significantly
affect traffic on the Eumundi-
Noosa Road. the roundabout
outside the School and pedestrian
children on the footpath entrance
in the event of queuing to access
the proposed Development. The
Applicant has provided no
objective analysis of the likely
queuing frequency or extent. The
Applicant's response is indicative
of the fact that the Applicant has
not conducted the required
analysis and expects the
Assessment Manager to determine
what is appropriate. which is
unacceptable in the already
challenging circumstances.
017 Car parking areas are 017 Complies Does not Comply
landscaped ... Car parking areas have Cannot be compliant as they do
been suitably landscaped. not meet the requirements of the
Landscaping Code Objective 028.
The Application does not comply in the areas outlined above and has completely failed to
address adequately the potential impacts on the adjoining School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning
Report the Applicant makes unfounded. unqualified and unsupported opinion as to the potential
impacts on the adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive nor soundly
validated for example:
Applicants Response I Assertion Objectors' Response
1. The proposed petrol store building is This is a statement of fact without justification as
located more than 10m form the to its relevance.
23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine LoveRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine LoveRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.