Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

.'




      Code Objective               Developer's Assessment        Objectors' Assessment
                                                                 not dominate the streetscape.
      011 Access and egress                                      Does not Comply
      points do not impact on                                    Given the nature of the
      the safety and operations                                  development and proximity to the
      of the road system                                         School the proposed access and
                                                                 egress point does impact
                                                                 adversely on the safety and
                                                                 operation of the Eumundi-Noosa
                                                                 Road.
      014 Provision is made for    014 Complies                  Does not Comply
      pedestrian and vehicular     Can comply via condition      The Applicants response is
      queues at conflict points;   where applicable.             inconsistent and vague. The
                                                                 Development will significantly
                                                                 affect traffic on the Eumundi-
                                                                 Noosa Road. the roundabout
                                                                 outside the School and pedestrian
                                                                 children on the footpath entrance
                                                                 in the event of queuing to access
                                                                 the proposed Development. The
                                                                 Applicant has provided no
                                                                 objective analysis of the likely
                                                                 queuing frequency or extent. The
                                                                 Applicant's response is indicative
                                                                 of the fact that the Applicant has
                                                                 not conducted the required
                                                                 analysis and expects the
                                                                 Assessment Manager to determine
                                                                 what is appropriate. which is
                                                                 unacceptable in the already
                                                                 challenging circumstances.
      017 Car parking areas are    017 Complies                  Does not Comply
      landscaped ...               Car parking areas have        Cannot be compliant as they do
                                   been suitably landscaped.     not meet the requirements of the
                                                                 Landscaping Code Objective 028.

     The Application does not comply in the areas outlined above and has completely failed to
     address adequately the potential impacts on the adjoining School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning
     Report the Applicant makes unfounded. unqualified and unsupported opinion as to the potential
     impacts on the adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive nor soundly
     validated for example:


       Applicants Response I Assertion            Objectors' Response
       1. The proposed petrol store building is This is a statement of fact without justification as
          located more than 10m form the to its relevance.



                                                                                                 23

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love.pdf · 10.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.