Council archive · source document
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine Love
Very large file (10.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
.,
school boundary
10m is in effect too close to the School boundary
to ensure the safety of the children attending the
School. We have demonstrated elsewhere in this
document that international and Australian best
practice demands that service station facilities be
set back a far greater distance from the School.
2. The nearest structure on the school The relevance of this statement is unclear and if
boundary is the pump house for the anything demonstrates the proximity of the
school pool proposed service station to the School pool
facilities used by toddlers and young children.
3. The proposed service station is Visual distinction is the least of the concerns that
orientated away from the school and are associated with the location of a service
towards the Eumundi- Noosa Road station adjacent to, indeed adjoining, a School
frontage, providing visual distinction and its associated health and physical education
between both sites. facilities.
4. The service station refuelling area is The Applicant provides no justification for its
sufficiently distanced from the school assertion that the Development "is sufficiently
boundary which is greater than 25m. distanced from the school boundary which is
greater than 25m:
In the contrary we have demonstrated elsewhere
in this document that international and Australian
best practice demands that service station
facilities be set back a far greater distance from
the School.
5. All vehicle access relating to the The relevance of this statement is once again
service station and future proposed unclear. The access being off Eumundi-Noosa
Lot 2 development is obtained via Road, which is the same as the access to the
Eumundi- Noosa Road which is more School and only a short distance away creates
than suitably distanced from the the potential for increased traffic queuing and
school access off Walter Hay Drive. obstruction along the short stretch of road
between the two entrances.
6. A dedicated pedestrian pathway from Again the relevance of this statement is unclear.
Walter Hay Drive is proposed. This The pathway provides no additional protection for
pathway connects Walter Hay Drive the School children. Indeed it provides further
directly to the site and the store unwanted opportunity for children to access the
building, thus reducing any potential shop, which is undoubtedly the main purpose of
conflict between pedestrians and the development, that is to encourage the school
vehicles. children to purchase from the shop and increase
the profits to the owner at the expense of - and
threat to - the School children.
24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine LoveRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Nadine LoveRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.