Town Planning Assessment Report (1)

development site by:                   the outer walls of the building;
1.      causing ponding of water 2.        is limited to a maximum of
on the site or nearby land;         500m2; and
2.      increasing flooding, which 3.      does not impact on the
adversely affects the safety or use local   drainage     of  adjoining
of   any     land upstream and properties.
downstream;
3.      adversely affecting the flow
of water in any overland flow path;
and
4.     adversely    affecting the
privacy or visual amenity of
surrounding property.
Editor's Note—Development should
ensure that filling does not impact
on the amenity and usability of
neighbouring properties (including
loss of privacy caused by relative
level changes) or offsite drainage.


Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code

Performance Outcome                    Acceptable Outcome                 Response

PO4 Where a coastal building line      No acceptable outcome provided     Complies with OO(a)(b)(c)
does not exist on a lot fronting the                                      On the Lower Level, the
beachfront or a reserve adjoining                                         development exceeds the 6m
the beachfront, new buildings and                                         rear setback requirement to
structures are setback no less                                            the building wall. The existing
than 6 metres from the seaward                                            pool will be maintained. New
boundary of the site.                                                     decking and steps to the
                                                                          turfed area at the rear of the
                                                                          site is proposed within the 6m
                                                                          rear setback requirement. The
                                                                          outermost projection of the
                                                                          rear deck is 1.5m from the
                                                                          rear     boundary.    This    is
                                                                          demonstrated        on      the
                                                                          Relaxation    Plan     (drawing
                                                                          number WD.105). Setbacks to
                                                                          the rear on the Main and
                                                                          Upper Levels greatly exceed
                                                                          the minimum requirement.


                                                                          Despite this, the proposal is
                                                                          considered to comply with the
                                                                          Overall Outcomes of the code
                                                                          as follows:




                                                                                                      27