Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (12.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 JUNE 2019
Matters Raised Comments
Impacts during construction
There is no consideration given to construction Agreed, no details are provided about how access will
access to lot 3. be obtained build the detached house on Lot 3. It is
noted the access easement on Peppers resort only
takes effect once approval has been granted and the
use of the detached house has commenced.
Impact during construction will extend to: This concern would normally be addressed by the
inclusion of a reasonable and relevant conditions of
The walkway will be closed during approval should the application be recommended for
construction;
approval and/or assessed at the time of subsequent
Hardship for existing residents and nearby Operational Works application.
businesses due to traffic disruption, noise
and dust; and
Risk to safety of pedestrians.
Refuse
The proposed refuse locations with result in: This concern would normally be addressed by the
inclusion of a reasonable and relevant condition of
Odour impacts approval should the application be recommended for
Dumping into the wildlife corridor approval and/or assessed at the time of subsequent
Operational Works application.
Rainwater
No proposed collection of rainwater. Rainwater water tanks are proposed for the two
dwelling houses otherwise there is no planning
requirement currently for water tanks.
Infrastructure Services
The infrastructure services required for the The existing infrastructure is available for the proposed
development are not available development without creating any undue load on the
existing services in the locality
Traffic
Attunga Heights and nearby intersection Advice received from a specialist traffic engineering
cannot accommodate the additional traffic consultant engaged by Council concluded that while
generated by the proposed development. there will be additional traffic as a result of the proposed
Attunga Heights is already narrow and unsafe development, it would be acceptable according to
for pedestrians. normal limits for such a street.
The existing problem is heightened during
holiday periods.
Carparking
The proposed development provides The proposed development does comply with the
insufficient onsite visitor car parking. Noosa Plan car parking provisions.
There is already car parking issues in Attunga
heights.
Emergency and service vehicles are already
unable to access the street.
Need and Community Benefit
There is no demonstrated need for the It is agreed there is no overriding need for the proposed
development to override the provisions of the development.
Open Space Conservation area.
There is no existing shortage of housing.
Page 97 of 133
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.