Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-06-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

of 133

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (12.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                               11 JUNE 2019


Matters Raised                                      Comments
Impacts during construction
There is no consideration given to construction     Agreed, no details are provided about how access will
access to lot 3.                                    be obtained build the detached house on Lot 3. It is
                                                    noted the access easement on Peppers resort only
                                                    takes effect once approval has been granted and the
                                                    use of the detached house has commenced.
Impact during construction will extend to:          This concern would normally be addressed by the
                                                    inclusion of a reasonable and relevant conditions of
 The walkway will be closed during                approval should the application be recommended for
    construction;
                                                    approval and/or assessed at the time of subsequent
 Hardship for existing residents and nearby       Operational Works application.
    businesses due to traffic disruption, noise
    and dust; and
 Risk to safety of pedestrians.
Refuse
The proposed refuse locations with result in:       This concern would normally be addressed by the
                                                    inclusion of a reasonable and relevant condition of
 Odour impacts                                    approval should the application be recommended for
 Dumping into the wildlife corridor               approval and/or assessed at the time of subsequent
                                                    Operational Works application.
Rainwater
No proposed collection of rainwater.                Rainwater water tanks are proposed for the two
                                                    dwelling houses otherwise there is no planning
                                                    requirement currently for water tanks.
Infrastructure Services
The infrastructure services required for the        The existing infrastructure is available for the proposed
development are not available                       development without creating any undue load on the
                                                    existing services in the locality
Traffic
Attunga Heights and nearby intersection             Advice received from a specialist traffic engineering
cannot accommodate the additional traffic           consultant engaged by Council concluded that while
generated by the proposed development.              there will be additional traffic as a result of the proposed
Attunga Heights is already narrow and unsafe        development, it would be acceptable according to
for pedestrians.                                    normal limits for such a street.
The existing problem is heightened during
holiday periods.
Carparking
The      proposed        development     provides   The proposed development does comply with the
insufficient onsite visitor car parking.            Noosa Plan car parking provisions.
There is already car parking issues in Attunga
heights.
Emergency and service vehicles are already
unable to access the street.
Need and Community Benefit
There is no demonstrated need for the               It is agreed there is no overriding need for the proposed
development to override the provisions of the       development.
Open Space Conservation area.
There is no existing shortage of housing.

                                                                                             Page 97 of 133
Log in to download the original file

2019-06-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda(PDF, 11MB).pdf · 12.0 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.