2017-07-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   11 JULY 2017




                                                  Page 28 of 78

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                     11 JULY 2017

                                                                            PROJECT
                                                                            URBAN                  SZ
       Wednesday, 8 March 2017
       Our Ref: 16161 / Office: Sunshine Coast
       Council Ref: MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133

               NOOSA COUNCIL
               PO BOX 141
              TEWANTIN QLD 4565
              ATTENTION: The Chief Executive Officer

       Dear Sir
       REPRESENTATIONS ON DECISION NOTICE
       DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR RETAIL BUSINESS TYPE 2 SHOP &
       SALON, RETAIL BUSINESS TYPE 5 VEHICLE USES AND ENTERTAINMENT AND DINING BUSINESS
       TYPE 1 FOOD & BEVERAGE
       DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR OPERATIONAL WORK (ADVERTISING SIGNAGE)
       6 TAYLOR COURT, COOROY
       LOT 3 SP197517
       Further to recent correspondence with Council, 1am pleased to set out the applicant's representations
       on the above mentioned Decision Notice dated 23 January 2017. Council records will show that the
       applicant's appeal period was suspended on 9 February 2017. The representations relate to two (2)
       conditions in the Decision Notice and are discussed below.
       Condition 2
       Condition 2 references the approved plans for the development. The submitted Signage Plan (DA-08
       Rev PS, prepared by Red Dog Architects, dated 19.10.16 — enclosed here) is not included in the list of
       approved plans in Condition 2.   Subsequent discussions with Council's Development Planner, Glen
       Conforti, have confirmed that the Signage Plan was intended to be included as an approved plan.
       It is requested that Condition 2 is amended to reference the submitted Signage Plan.
       Condition 27(e)
       From the outset, it is reiterated that the applicant intends to incorporate a “best practice” stormwater
       design for this site and is committed to working with Council to achieve an outstanding and
       sustainable development. The applicant's civil engineer does however have some concerns with the
       current wording of condition 27(e) and requests clarification on the requirements of the condition.
       Covey Associates prepared the original Stormwater Management Plan that accompanied the
       development application and has since prepared the attached correspondence outlining the concerns
       with condition 27(e). Covey Associate's correspondence requests clarification as to how the Plan of
       Development's water quality targets (as referenced in condition 27(e)) were determined and what
       regulations or guidelines they are linked to.
       Covey Associates’ explain the differences between “concentration based outcomes” and “load based
       reduction targets”. Given the time that has passed since the adoption of the Plan of Development, it is
       possible that the guidelines that the POD’s water quality targets are linked to have been superseded

    SUNSHINE COAST                   BRISBANE                                           2   oS
    Suite 1, Corner Surf Road & Gardak Street 1/34 Commercial Road E [email protected] = N Ue    al]
    Alexandra Headland Qld 4572      Newstead Qld 4006       W projecturban.com,au      =  >         i
    PO Box 6380 Maroochydore BC Qld 4558 PO Box 266 Albion Qld 4010 proyect upBAN PIY UD 9    hae    KING
    P 07 5443 2844                   P 07 3257 4371          ACN 608 895 923 ABN 97 608 895 923

                                                                                                     Page 28 of 78