Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment 4B - Flora and Fauna Assessment Rev 5
Native Foresters
Column 1: Column 2: Column 3:
Requirements that apply to all RESPONSE Government Supported Infrastructure RESPONSE Self-Assessment Criteria SELF –
Government Supported development in a KHA that is exempt ASSESSMENT
Infrastructure development in SEQ from the Self-Assessment Criteria of RESPONSE
Column
Queensland Cabinet Budget been
Review Committee or other project- resubmitted,
specific governing body, relevant but SARA
Minister or Federal Government has
including being listed on Qld previously
Transport Roads Implementation approved
Program, within 12 months of the the works.
commencement of this policy; or
c. received a development approval,
issued prior to the commencement
of this policy, as a result of a
development assessment process
under the Planning Act 2016 or
other relevant Act.
TABLE 7: Self-Assessment Criteria where interfering with koala habitat in an area that is both a KPA and a KHA, is
unavoidable
Public Sector Entities must: RESPONSE
1. Minimise interfering with koala habitat The proposed clearing is required to extend the landfill facility in accordance with the Noosa Council Master Plan for
the Noosaville Waste Management Facility. Lot 77 SP298776 is 322.13 hectares in total and the landfill use currently
has an approximate area of 49 hectares (i.e. 15% of Lot 77). The site contains approximately:
• 235 hectares of Core KHA, and
• 31 hectares of Locally refined KHA.
The works will result in impacting:
• 0.21 hectares of Core KHA, and
• 0.81 hectares of Locally refined KHA.
• A total of 1.02 hectares of mapped KHA (which equates to impacting approximately 0.4% of the mapped KHA within Lot 77).
2. To the best extent possible mitigate any impacts that As detailed in Table 2 and Section 4 of Impact Assessment Report for MNES & MSES by Native Foresters dated 10th
interfering with koala habitat has on koala values. December 2023 (Doc. No.: 220716-MNES/MSES- Rev 3) there are a number of mitigation actions proposed to reduce
impacts to koala habitat, as summarized below:
• Fauna spotter catcher to undertake pre-clearance survey.
• Clearing supervised by a Fauna spotter catcher
• Clearing to be sequential as outlined in NCA 1992 requirements.
• Clearing area to be delineated prior to work and no entry to adjacent protected vegetation by personnel or machinery is allowed
during works.
Noosa Landfill & RRC – northern section – Fauna and Flora Assessment – REV4 45
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.