Original source · versioned page text
2015-06-29 General Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 29 JUNE 2015
Government Priority Comment
Refreshing the categories of development, to ensure they are a true standards- The notion is that exempt and self-assessment would merge to be acceptable
based assessment, and simplifying them to accepted, assessable and prohibited development. This seems reasonable and we would support as much as
categories. appropriate being in that category.
Assessable development would either require “standard” or “merit” assessment
and “merit” may be further divided as some would require public notification but
some possibly would not.
The re-introduction of a prohibited category would be highly desirable.
For the assessable development category, specific consultation will occur about Notionally, development that is currently code assessable, which is consistent
retaining the current levels of assessment (compliance, code, impact) or whether with the intent of the zone and neighbourhood and should reasonably be
further change is needed, although notifiable development will continue to expected to occur therefore should be subject to “standard” assessment in the
provide for submitter appeal rights new regime however Councils may decide some warrant “merit” assessment.
Uses that are currently subject to impact assessment would require merit
assessment in the new regime. Where the appropriateness of a proposed use is
questionable or its potential impacts on others cannot be adequately assessed
through nominated codes, notification should also be required.
Replacing SPA’s complex and complicated rules for making assessment The rules for assessment in SPA are not considered complex and complicated
decisions, with simplified rules that encourage a more holistic approach to for making a decision and it is highly desirable that for developments in conflict
considering development proposals. with the planning scheme, the same test for sufficient grounds to override the
conflict continue to apply.
Under these rules, assessable development would either be approved (or
conditioned) using established benchmarks or decided against policy and other The current legislation for performance based planning schemes has led to
relevant public interest matters cumbersome planning schemes and a lengthy list of requirements that a
development must meet. This has led to many planners taking a tick box
approach and not taking a more holistic approach. The absence of strategic
plans in planning schemes has also contributed to this narrow approach to
assessment.
Page 15 of 28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.