Original source · versioned page text
2015-06-29 General Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 29 JUNE 2015
Government Priority Comment
Simplifying Community Infrastructure Designation, including introducing Proponents should pay for the infrastructure required for their development; this
arrangements enabling the Planning Minister to assess against a single set of includes private schools, churches, private hospitals etc which should not be
state assessment criteria, with development for a designated purpose exempt excluded from having to pay for their infrastructure demand through a
from state and local planning instruments Community Infrastructure designation.
Enshrining existing public notification requirements in legislation to ensure they As long as there is distinction between potential plans or amendments with
are not at the discretion of the Minister significant impact as opposed to ones with minor impact.
Working with local government to enhance public reporting on development Transparent assessment time frames are useful, providing the approach does
assessment timeframes not lead to comparison of Council time frames as delegations, resources,
planning schemes, site constraints etc are not comparable for each council.
Ensuring that all publicly notified applications continue to attract third party This is strongly supported as the current cost rules have meant the threat of
appeal rights, as well as restoring the rights of resident and community group appeal costs has excluded residents and community groups from appealing.
submitters to appeal decisions to the Planning and Environment Court without Community groups and individuals should be confident they can express their
fear of having costs awarded against them concerns honestly and openly without fear of financial imposition.
Improving Temporary Local Planning Instruments by extending their life from 12 Twelve months certainly too short a period given how long it takes to amend a
months to up to 2 years to account for scheme amendment timeframes, and scheme – alternatively just make it possible to do scheme amendments more
introducing the ability for them to be amended quickly.
Ensuring open access to planning and development information, including There is some inconsistency between Councils in what information is made
minimum access rules in the regulations available on line for the community in respect to development applications and it
would be clearer if this was made consistent through the legislation.
Simplifying and making consistent Ministerial powers Sounds reasonable
Increasing penalties to bring them in line with similar offences and ensuring Agreed
director’s liabilities align with the national benchmarks
Ensuring that enforcement notices attach to the land and are notified on title to Agreed
ensure prospective purchases are not caught unawares
Page 17 of 28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.