Council archive · source document
MCU22.0174-Applicant's Response to Council's FA · MCU22/0174
Applicant’s Response
Refer to the Revised Architectural Plans prepared by Tim Ditchfield Architects (Revision C) enclosed within
Attachment 1. An amended design is proposed to the front façade as suggested by Council and is
illustrated below.
The new design clearly demonstrates that the garage doors comply with the outcomes specified in AO15 of
the Medium Density Residential Zone Code as they are:
• No more than 50% of the site’s frontage, and
• The doors are separated by 2 metres.
Figure 1: Edward Street Perspective (Attachment 1, Plan No. DD8.1 C)
Council’s Issue – Entry Gates
As per item 2 of the information request, the entry pergolas are located in the front and side setbacks. This
results in less area for landscaping. The front 6m has a large amount of hardstand and additional structures
in the front and side setback is not supported.
Information Required by Council
2. Provide amended plans the remove the entry gates in the required setbacks and provide landscaping
in its place.
Applicant’s Response
The design of the entry gates has been revised. The entry gates have been setback into the site’s front
landscaped area, and the pergolas have been removed.
PO Box 1818 07 5474 3873
Noosa Heads [email protected]
QLD 4567 rgstrategic.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU22.0174-Applicant's Response to Council's FA.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 338 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.