Council archive · source document
MCU22.0174-Applicant's Response to Council's FA · MCU22/0174
Council’s Issue - Side Setback of Roof
As per item 4 of the Information Request, the proposed setback still does not comply with AO12.1 of the
Medium Density Residential zone code. The extent of overhang contributes to the extent of the beam
across the frontage and across the garaging, a design which is not considered typical of Noosaville.
Information Required by Council
3. Provide amended plans that comply with AO12.1 of the Medium Density Residential zone code as it
cannot be considered to comply with corresponding PO 12.
Applicant’s Response
The proposed architectural plans have been revised to further increase the setback from the side boundaries.
Refer to Drawing DD2.1C which illustrates a 2-metre setback from the side boundaries. The revised boundary
setbacks are shown Figures 2 and 3 below.
Figure 2: North-East Perspective (DD8.6 C) Figure 3: South-East Perspective (DD8.7 C)
This ends our client’s response to matters raised by Council within their Further Advice. We ask that Council
proceeds with the assessment of this application.
Should you require any additional information or have any queries please to not hesitate to contact us.
Kind Regards,
Russell Green APIA MQELA
Managing Director
RG Strategic
PO Box 1818 07 5474 3873
Noosa Heads [email protected]
QLD 4567 rgstrategic.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU22.0174-Applicant's Response to Council's FA.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 338 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.