Original source · versioned page text
2020-04-30 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 30 APRIL 2020
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 57 of 60
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 30 APRIL 2020
ATTACHMENT 2
OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL MEETING STRUCTURES
Some brief notes on different types of Council decision making structures. There are nuances on
some of these but these are the most common types for Councils in Queensland.
OPTION 1 - Council Meetings only (No Committees)
@) cellar las
meeting
About
° Used by a lot of councils (particularly smaller councils).
° Most use a once a month meeting approach but some run two meetings a month.
Pros
e All Councillors deal with all issues and make a decision on the day
° Less meetings
Cons
° Difficult to request further information without deferring the decision to the next month.
° Less time between the issue of the agenda and the decision time leaving less time for
consideration by Councillors.
° Only able to consider the issue once, not debate and seek further information before the final
decision.
e Leads to long Council meetings (often all day) which can lead to fatigue towards the end of the
day and potentially poor decision-making.
OPTION 2 - Council Meeting with one Standing Committee
Standing Ordinary
Committee meeting
About
° All Councillors are members of a committee (often called a General Committee) that considers
issues on the agenda in the first instance and makes recommendations to the Council.
° The Standing Committee does not make any decisions per se (other than a decision to make
a recommendation to the Council).
° The Council then considers the recommendations from the Standing Committee and makes
its decisions.
Pros
° All Councillors have input into all matters on the agenda in the first instance.
° With a significant number of new Councillors, this approach would assist new Councillors in
getting across all issues coming before the Council for consideration.
e There is time between the Standing Committee meeting and the Council Ordinary meeting to
receive more information before the final decision is made.
° It allows Councillors “two bites of the cherry” to consider the issues and hear debate before a
final decision is made.
Cons
e Likely to lead to very long General Committee meetings which could lead to fatigue towards
the end of the day and potentially poor decision-making.
° Higher level of workload for all Councillors with two meetings to consider all issues.
Page 57 of 60See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.