Original source · versioned page text
2016-11-14 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 8 NOVEMBER 2016
Five (5) tenders were received, four (4) conforming and one (1) non-conforming. The evaluation
panel carried out an assessment of the four (4) conforming tenders:
Hall Contracting Pty Ltd
Marine Civil Contractors
Neo Infrastructure
Rimlex t/as Nabis Dredging
Tenders were evaluated using the following criteria:
Capability and Resourcing;
Track Record;
Methodology;
Quality;
Safety;
Environment Sustainability;
Contribution to Local Economy; and
Price.
The evaluation methodology considered non-price elements (65% of the score) and a price
component (35% of the score). The tender evaluation matrix is provided at Attachment 2.
3. Evaluation
Nabis Dredging have demonstrated high expertise in the construction of coastal projects in
Queensland, and is the contractor who constructed the Stage 1 Munna Point Groynes.
Nabis Dredging scored the third highest total technical score, however were the lowest tenderer
on price. Whist Nabis scored the lowest for the Quality and Safety categories, Nabis did
demonstrate to the tender evaluation panel that they had:
a sound Construction Safety Plan;
satisfactory Work Safety and Induction Plans in place; and
appropriate Quality Management Systems in place.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil
Finance & Risk
A provision of $280,000 (excluding GST) has been made within the 2016/17 budget, Nabis Pty
Ltd’s tender is $263,737 (excluding GST).
The risks of not constructing Stage 2 of the groyne field are:
the risk of loss of revenue to the Munna Point Caravan Park if campsites are not available
due to erosion.
the risk of exposed foreshore and geofabric bags causing a public trip hazard and a loss of
aesthetic appeal to the foreshore.
Page 52 of 111
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.