Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Approved Plan - EXE230029

of 45

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
            4.2     Subsurface Conditions
            Based on our review of the provided ASI “Soil Test Report” and our site observations, the pertinent aspects
            of the subsurface conditions are summarised below:
                 Sandy clay fill assessed to be of medium to high plasticity was encountered in BH2 and was 0.7m thick.
                  Based on the location of BH2, the fill is likely backfill to the timber sleeper retaining wall. Based on the
                  DCP test results the fill has been assessed to be poorly compacted. We also note that in the absence of
                  formal records of placement and density test results, the fill is regarded as ‘uncontrolled’ as defined in
                  AS2870-2011 ‘Residential slabs and footings’.
                 Silty sand topsoil (0.03m thick) encountered at surface level (BH1) and below the fill (BH2).
                 From below the topsoil, BH1 encountered gravelly sand over residual sandy clay assessed to be of low to
                  medium plasticity to the termination depth of 3.0m and BH2 initially encountered a 0.5m thick band of
                  residual gravelly sand overlying residual sandy clay assessed to be of medium to high plasticity which
                  extends to the termination depth of 3.0m. Based on our review of the DCP blow counts we interpret:
                      o The relative density of the gravelly sand in BH1 to be very loose and the clay strength to be
                          initially soft then soft to firm, improving to stiff to very stiff below about 2.2m depth and hard
                          strength below about 2.4m depth.
                      o The relative density of the gravelly sand in BH2 to be loose to medium dense and the underlying
                          clays to be generally of hard strength.
                 At the termination depth of BH1, the ASI log notes “approaching weathered sandstone” and DCP refusal
                  was at about 2.0m depth. In BH2, DCP refusal was at about 2.2m depth but there was no similar note
                  regarding “approaching weathered sandstone”. Based on our experience in this area and the results of
                  the ASI investigation, we have interpreted the DCP refusal depths to indicate the surface of extremely
                  weathered sandstone bedrock surface at depths of about 2.8m (BH1) and 2.2m (BH2), although the
                  presence of bands of weathered bedrock or ‘floaters’ within the residual soil profile (indicated by the
                  high DCP blow counts) cannot be discounted. We note that the transition of hard residual clay to
                  extremely weathered sandstone represents the weathering profile of the bedrock and the actual soil-
                  rock interface can vary across the site. However, based on the topographic setting of the site overall the
                  bedrock surface would be expected to step or slope down to the north.
                 No groundwater was encountered within the depth of the investigation.



            4.3     Summary of Observations
            We recommend that the summary of observations which follows in Sections 4.3.1 to 4.3.4 be read in
            conjunction with the attached Figure 2.



            4.3.1 Topography
                 The site is located on the crest of a hillside above the western foreshore of Lake Cootharaba and is
                  situated on the northern side of a small promontory (orientated east-west) in the foreshore area. The
                  upper (southern) portion of the site is relatively flat and has a southern frontage on to Woongar Street.




            35891URrpt Rev1                                      3
Document Set ID: 22532435
Version: 1, Version Date: 07/08/2023
Log in to download the original file

Approved Plan - EXE230029.pdf · 2.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.