Original source · versioned page text
Cooroy Care Farm Town Planning Report - 4 - Report (003)
REPORT 3.2 Referral agency prelodgement meeting A pre-lodgement meeting with the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning was held on 12 April 2018. A summary of the key items discussed, and how the proposal responds is outlined below. Table 8: Referral agency prelodgement meeting outcomes Issues discussed Outcome / Response Regional landscape and rural production area (RLRPA) The proposal has since been revised to ensure all uses designation under ShapingSEQ, and the repercussions of accumulate to less than 5,000m2 in gross floor area (GFA). this on the Gross Floor Area of the aged care facility, chapel and community hall. The internal connection road and driveway must be The internal connection road and driveway are located located within the property boundary. They must not be within the property boundary, refer to Proposal Plans – located within the road reserve. Appendix D. Sight lines for access must consider 100 km/h speed limit Sight lines are demonstrated within the Site Access Advice on the state-controlled road, and the crest near the – Appendix F. railway. Screening / fencing along the site boundary will be The level difference between the sites and Elm Street will required to ensure the development does not create a ensure headlights from cars within the development do not safety hazard from vehicle headlights. This may be impact on the safety of the public road. As such, extensive achieved by establishing a dense landscape buffer. screening / fencing is not proposed along this boundary. Traffic generation for community uses must be considered The traffic generation for the community hall and chapel separate to the aged care facility. have been considered below in Section 4.7. The traffic impact assessment will determine the required Refer to Site Access Advice – Appendix F. turn treatments and deceleration lane requirements for access to the development. The development application must demonstrate that the Refer to Stormwater Management Plan – Appendix G development will not worsen stormwater, flooding or which demonstrates no worsening to nearby State drainage impacts on the state-controlled road or the transport corridors. railway. A noise report will be required to demonstrate that the All habitable components of the proposal are located at development will achieve compliance with the relevant least 300m from the Bruce Highway. The proposal is also noise criteria given the proximity to the railway and state- retaining vegetation which will assist in the diffusion of controlled road. noise travelling from the Bruce Highway. Development will trigger referral if it interferes with the The proposal will not interfere with the watercourse on site. identified watercourse on-site. Location of infrastructure in relation to category B The Proposal Plans – Appendix D demonstrate the vegetation is unclear. proximity of the proposal to the Category B vegetation. To avoid referral, all proposed infrastructure must be The proposal complies and does not require referral for located within a Category X area and setback from the vegetation clearing. nearest category B area by appropriate firebreak and safety buffer distance. Roads must be setback at least 10 metres from the nearest category B area. Prior to submitting the application, written confirmation No clearing of protected native vegetation is occurring. from DNRME must be obtained that the proposed development is for a relevant purpose under section 22A of the Vegetation Management Act 1999. PR139784 | Town Planning Report | v4 | 28 June 2019 rpsgroup.com Page 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.