Original source · versioned page text
2015-09-24 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 24 SEPTEMBER 2015
GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
21 SEPTEMBER 2015 - Crs Frank Wilkie (Chair), Bob Abbot, Sandy Bolton, Joe Jurisevic,
Frank Pardon, Noel Playford and Tony Wellington
1 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR A MIXED
USE SHOPPING CENTRE EXPANSION AND OPERATIONAL WORKS AT 28 EENIE
CREEK ROAD, NOOSAVILLE (MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001)
Cr Wellington declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 173 of the
Local Government Act 2009) due to him being a submitter against a similar application (by a
different applicant) on the same site. Cr Wellington believed he could consider this item impartially
and in the public interest and therefore remained in the meeting room for the debate and decision on
this matter.
Council Resolution
Moved: Cr Abbot
Seconded: Cr Bolton
That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 15 September 2015 and refuse Application No. MCU15/0106 &
OPW15/0001 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use for a mixed use
shopping centre expansion and associated Operational Works situated at 28 Eenie Creek
Road, Noosaville for the following reasons:
1. The development conflicts with the South East Queensland Regional Plan’s Desired
Regional Outcome for employment because it will not diversify Noosa’s economy and
sterilises land to be retained for long-term non-retail opportunities.
2. The development fundamentally conflicts with The Noosa Plan’s intent for the site to
provide for long-term non-retail employment growth and diversification.
3. The development will have undesirable economic impacts on existing commercial
centres.
4. The applicant has not demonstrated an economic need for additional retail
development in the Shire Business Centre.
5. The development will have unacceptable impacts on traffic safety and traffic
operations on Noosa’s road network.
6. The development will necessitate expensive and disruptive traffic signals at two or
more critical intersections within the network, which, without the subject development,
can operate satisfactorily until well beyond 2026 with only minor upgrades to the
existing roundabout-based system. Introduction of new signalised intersections to
the local road network is contrary to Noosa’s desired low-key network character and
planning intent and is not acceptable.
7. The development is not consistent with the assumptions stated in Noosa’s Local
Government Infrastructure Plan for future development of the Noosa Business
Centre. The applicant’s proposed contributions toward intersection upgrades do not
satisfactorily address the development’s likely traffic impacts and any additional costs
of upgrading the traffic network should be to the development and not the community.
8. The development will not provide sufficient on-site parking to accommodate design
peak parking demands reasonably expected to be generated and will have adverse
impact on the convenience of use of the Noosa Business Centre.
Page 11 of 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.